Volume 11 - Summer Supplementary
Ann Appl Sport Sci 2023, 11 - Summer Supplementary: 0-0 |
Back to browse issues page
1- Symbiosis School of Sports Sciences, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, Maharashtra, India , amritashish.bagchi@ssss.edu.in
2- Sports Authority of India, Netaji Subhas National Insitute of Sports, Patiala, Punjab, India
3- Symbiosis School of Sports Sciences, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, Maharashtra, India
2- Sports Authority of India, Netaji Subhas National Insitute of Sports, Patiala, Punjab, India
3- Symbiosis School of Sports Sciences, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, Maharashtra, India
Abstract: (1373 Views)
Background. There is a dearth of literature on match analysis in field hockey. Time-motion analysis, the relationship between play patterns and goal-scoring opportunities, and penalty corner strategies are currently available in the literature on field hockey. Nevertheless, none of the studies have identified the factors contributing to winning. These factors could be used to help coaches develop a specific training schedule, monitor playing patterns, improve player selection processes, specify each player's role, and evaluate their overall performance.
Objectives. The present study aimed to identify game-related statistics in Field Hockey that best discriminate between winning and losing teams. The data was gathered from the 2018 Men’s Hockey World Cup matches.
Methods. The grouping variable selected for this study was Match Results (i.e., Win/Lose). Whereas the selected game-related statistics were Ball Possession, Shots Attempted, Pass Accuracy, Circle Entries, and Penalty Corner. A total of 36 matches were analyzed. Independent samples t-test was used to compare the mean difference and discriminant analysis was applied to identify the game-related statistics that best discriminate between winning and losing teams.
Results. The Results have shown a significant (p<0.05) mean difference for all the selected game-related statistics and the developed discriminant model was also found to be significant (p=0.000). The interpretation of the generated discriminant functions was examined based on the Structure Coefficients (SC) ≥ |0.30|.
Conclusion. According to the statistical significance of the model and SC, the variables which majorly contributed to discriminating between winning and losing teams were circle entries (SC=.663), ball possession (SC=.415) and shots attempted (SC=.307). Winning teams were examined to be ahead of losing teams in all the game-related statistics.
Objectives. The present study aimed to identify game-related statistics in Field Hockey that best discriminate between winning and losing teams. The data was gathered from the 2018 Men’s Hockey World Cup matches.
Methods. The grouping variable selected for this study was Match Results (i.e., Win/Lose). Whereas the selected game-related statistics were Ball Possession, Shots Attempted, Pass Accuracy, Circle Entries, and Penalty Corner. A total of 36 matches were analyzed. Independent samples t-test was used to compare the mean difference and discriminant analysis was applied to identify the game-related statistics that best discriminate between winning and losing teams.
Results. The Results have shown a significant (p<0.05) mean difference for all the selected game-related statistics and the developed discriminant model was also found to be significant (p=0.000). The interpretation of the generated discriminant functions was examined based on the Structure Coefficients (SC) ≥ |0.30|.
Conclusion. According to the statistical significance of the model and SC, the variables which majorly contributed to discriminating between winning and losing teams were circle entries (SC=.663), ball possession (SC=.415) and shots attempted (SC=.307). Winning teams were examined to be ahead of losing teams in all the game-related statistics.
Full-Text [PDF 560 kb]
(723 Downloads)
APPLICABLE REMARKS
APPLICABLE REMARKS
• Enhance the importance of the selected game-related statistics in field hockey.
• Assists coaches and trainers to design more specific training programs in Field Hockey.
• Assists coaches to focus on different players’ contributions to team performance.
• Assists coaches and trainers to design more specific training programs in Field Hockey.
• Assists coaches to focus on different players’ contributions to team performance.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Motor Control and its Related Branches
Received: 2022/09/15 | Accepted: 2022/11/16
Received: 2022/09/15 | Accepted: 2022/11/16
References
1. Hughes M, Franks IM. Notational analysis of sport. Systems for better coaching and performance in sport. London: Routledge; 2004. [DOI:10.4324/9780203641958]
2. Guru CS, Krishnan A, Mahajan U, Sharma D. Heart Rate Values During Shooting is a Field-Side Performance Analysis Tool in Archery-A study of Elite Indian Archers. International Journal of Sport Studies for Health. 2020;3(1):e99687. [DOI:10.5812/intjssh.99687]
3. Lorenzo J, Lorenzo A, Conte D, Giménez M. Long-Term Analysis of Elite Basketball Players' Game-Related Statistics Throughout Their Careers. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019;10:1-6. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00421] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Lord F, Pyne DB, Welvaert M, Mara JK. Capture, analyse, visualise: An exemplar of performance analysis in practice in field hockey. PLOS ONE. 2022;17(5). [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0268171] [PMID] [PMCID]
5. Carling C, Reilly T, Williams A. Performance assessment for field sports. London: Routledge; 2009. [DOI:10.4324/9780203890691]
6. Villarejo D, Palao JM, Ortega E, Gomez-Ruano MÁ, Kraak W. Match-related statistics discriminating between playing positions during the men's 2011 Rugby World Cup. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. 2015;15(1):97-111. [DOI:10.1080/24748668.2015.11868779]
7. Bagchi, A, Raizada, S. Development of the discriminant model for classifying cricketers based on anthropometric and physical variables. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. 2020;23(17):231-759. [DOI:10.36295/ASRO.2020.231759]
8. Damani C, Damani B, Bagchi A. Match statistics significant to win the initial and intense rounds of a tennis tournament. TRENDS in Sport Sciences. 2020;27(4):225-231.
9. Bhanushali D, Bagchi A. Impact of non-performance-oriented factors on the final result of international test cricket matches. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. 2020;23(17):231-716. [DOI:10.36295/ASRO.2020.231716]
10. Gomez M, Lorenzo A, Ortega E, Sampaio J, Ibàñez S. Game Related Statistics Discriminating Between Starters and Nonstarters Players in Women's National Basketball Association League (WNBA). Journal of sports science & medicine. 2009;8(2):278-283.
11. Lorenzo A, Gómez MÁ, Ortega E, Ibáñez SJ, Sampaio J. Game related statistics which discriminate between winning and losing under-16 male basketball games. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine. 2010;9(4):664-668.
12. Ibáñez SJ, Sampaio J, Feu S, Lorenzo A, Gómez MA, Ortega E. Basketball game-related statistics that discriminate between teams' season-long success. European Journal of Sport Science. 2008;8(6):369-372. [DOI:10.1080/17461390802261470]
13. Carron, AV, Loughhead, TM, Bray, SR. The home advantage in sport competitions: Courneya and Carron's (1992) conceptual framework a decade later. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2005;23(4):395-407. [DOI:10.1080/02640410400021542] [PMID]
14. Gómez, MA, Lorenzo, A, Barakat, R, Ortega, E, Palao, JM. Differences in game-related statistics of basketball performance between men's winning and losing teams according to game location. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2008;106(1):98-107. [DOI:10.2466/pms.106.1.43-50] [PMID]
15. García, J, Ibáñez, J, Gómez, A, Sampaio, J. Basketball Game-related statistics discriminating ACB league teams according to game location, game outcome and final score differences. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. 2014;14(2):443-452. [DOI:10.1080/24748668.2014.11868733]
16. Sampaio, J, Janeira, M, Ibáñez, S, Lorenzo, A. Discriminant analysis of game-related statistics between basketball guards, forwards and centres in three professional leagues. European Journal of Sport Science. 2006;6(3):173-178. [DOI:10.1080/17461390600676200]
17. Conte, D, Lukonaitiene, I. Scoring Strategies Differentiating between Winning and Losing Teams during FIBA EuroBasket Women 2017. Sports. 2018;6(2):50. [DOI:10.3390/sports6020050] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Lago-Peñas C, Lago-Ballesteros J, Dellal A, Gómez M. Game-Related Statistics that Discriminated Winning, Drawing and Losing Teams from the Spanish Soccer League. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine. 2010;9(2):288-293.
19. Koo DH, Panday SB, Xu DY, Lee CY, Kim HY. Logistic regression of wins and losses in Asia League Ice Hockey in the 2014-2015 season. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. 2016;16(3):871-80. [DOI:10.1080/24748668.2016.11868935]
20. Lord F, Pyne DB, Welvaert M, Mara JK. Field hockey from the performance analyst's perspective: A systematic review. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching. 2021;17(1):220-232. [DOI:10.1177/17479541211008903]
21. Spencer M, Lawrence S, Rechichi C, Bishop D, Dawson B, Goodman C. Time-motion analysis of elite field hockey, with special reference to repeated-sprint activity. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2004;22(9):843-850. [DOI:10.1080/02640410410001716715] [PMID]
22. Ferreira AP, Volossovitch A, Sampaio J. Towards the game critical moments in basketball: a grounded theory approach. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. 2014;14(2):428-42. [DOI:10.1080/24748668.2014.11868732]
23. Hughes M, Franks I. Analysis of passing sequences, shots and goals in soccer. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2005;23(5):509-514. [DOI:10.1080/02640410410001716779] [PMID]
24. Lago-Ballesteros J, Lago-Peñas C. Performance in team sports: Identifying the keys to success in soccer. Journal of Human kinetics. 2010;25(1):85-91. [DOI:10.2478/v10078-010-0035-0]
25. Elferink-Gemser M, Visscher C, Lemmink K, Mulder T. Relation between multidimensional performance characteristics and level of performance in talented youth field hockey players. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2004;22(11-12):1053-63. [DOI:10.1080/02640410410001729991] [PMID]
26. Vinson D, Peters D. Position-specific performance indicators that discriminate between successful and unsuccessful teams in elite women's indoor field hockey: implications for coaching. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2015;34(4):311-320. [DOI:10.1080/02640414.2015.1055292] [PMID]
27. Sofwan N, Norasrudin S, Redzuan P, Mubin A. Distinguishing playing pattern between winning and losing field hockey team in Delhi FIH Road to London 2012 tournament. International Journal of Sport and Health Sciences. 2012;6(10):2532-2535.
28. Stöckl M, Morgan S. Visualization and analysis of spatial characteristics of attacks in field hockey. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. 2013;13(1):160-178. [DOI:10.1080/24748668.2013.11868639]
29. McGarry T, Anderson DI, Wallace SA, Hughes MD, Franks IM. Sport competition as a dynamical self-organizing system. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2002;20(10):771-781. [DOI:10.1080/026404102320675620] [PMID]
30. Ariff M, Norasrudin S, Rahmat A, Shariman I. Passing sequences towards field goals and penalty corners in men's field hockey. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise. 2014;10(2):638-647. [DOI:10.14198/jhse.2015.10.Proc2.01]
31. Vinson D, Padley S, Croad A, Jeffreys M, Brady A, James D. Penalty corner routines in elite women's indoor field hockey: Prediction of outcomes based on tactical decisions. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2013;31(8):887-893. [DOI:10.1080/02640414.2012.757341] [PMID]
32. Laird P, Sutherland P. Penalty corners in field hockey: A guide to success. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. 2003;3(1):19-26. [DOI:10.1080/24748668.2003.11868270]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |