year 11, Issue 3 (Autumn 2023)
Ann Appl Sport Sci 2023, 11(3): 0-0 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Song J, Park S, Kim B, Lee M. Reliability and Validity of the Heel Rise Test Using the Mobile Application. Ann Appl Sport Sci 2023; 11 (3)
URL: http://aassjournal.com/article-1-1173-en.html
URL: http://aassjournal.com/article-1-1173-en.html
1- Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Daejeon University, Republic of Korea
2- Department of Rehabilitation & Assistive Technology, National Rehabilitation Research Institute, National Rehabilitation Center, Republic of Korea
3- Department of Physical Therapy, Daejeon University, Republic of Korea ,mmlee@dju.kr
2- Department of Rehabilitation & Assistive Technology, National Rehabilitation Research Institute, National Rehabilitation Center, Republic of Korea
3- Department of Physical Therapy, Daejeon University, Republic of Korea ,
Abstract: (1270 Views)
Background. The heel-rise test is a measurement method that can evaluate the muscle endurance and muscle fatigue of the plantar flexor. On the other hand, there is a limit to quantifying the criteria because the evaluation method and criteria differ according to the measurement conditions.
Objectives. The purpose of this study is to compare the validity and reliability of the smartphone-based measurement application compared to the standardized surface electromyography (sEMG) for measuring muscle fatigue during the heel-rise test.
Methods. Fifty-seven adults in their 20s participated in the heel-rise test twice a week apart. The concurrent validity for muscle fatigue during the heel-rise test was measured using surface sEMG and 'Calf raise' application, and analyzed through correlation analysis. The intra-rater reliability and inter-rater reliability of the ‘Calf raise’ application were analyzed using ICC.
Results. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the 'Calf raise' application and sEMG showed a statistically significant correlation of r=0.509 for both loss (%) and slope value (p<0.01). The ‘Calf raise’ application showed high intra-rater reliability for loss (%) and slope value with ICC (2,1) = 0.986 and 0.987 respectively. It also showed high inter-rater reliability for loss (%) and slope value with ICC (2,1) =0.946 and 0.926.
Conclusion. The smartphone-based 'Calf rise' application can be usefully used in clinical practice as an evaluation tool capable of not only quantitative evaluation of counting the number of heel-rise tests but also qualitative evaluation of muscle fatigue.
Objectives. The purpose of this study is to compare the validity and reliability of the smartphone-based measurement application compared to the standardized surface electromyography (sEMG) for measuring muscle fatigue during the heel-rise test.
Methods. Fifty-seven adults in their 20s participated in the heel-rise test twice a week apart. The concurrent validity for muscle fatigue during the heel-rise test was measured using surface sEMG and 'Calf raise' application, and analyzed through correlation analysis. The intra-rater reliability and inter-rater reliability of the ‘Calf raise’ application were analyzed using ICC.
Results. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the 'Calf raise' application and sEMG showed a statistically significant correlation of r=0.509 for both loss (%) and slope value (p<0.01). The ‘Calf raise’ application showed high intra-rater reliability for loss (%) and slope value with ICC (2,1) = 0.986 and 0.987 respectively. It also showed high inter-rater reliability for loss (%) and slope value with ICC (2,1) =0.946 and 0.926.
Conclusion. The smartphone-based 'Calf rise' application can be usefully used in clinical practice as an evaluation tool capable of not only quantitative evaluation of counting the number of heel-rise tests but also qualitative evaluation of muscle fatigue.
Keywords: Electromyography, Heel-rise test, Muscle fatigue, Physical Examination, Equipment and Supplies
Full-Text [PDF 1058 kb]
(769 Downloads)
APPLICABLE REMARKS
APPLICABLE REMARKS
• This study finds that the Calf Raise application is a useful tool for measuring the muscle fatigue of the calf muscle.
• In the future, various measurement tools that are simple and can prove reliability will be needed.
• In the future, various measurement tools that are simple and can prove reliability will be needed.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Sport Biomechanics and its related branches
Received: 2023/01/12 | Accepted: 2023/03/20
Received: 2023/01/12 | Accepted: 2023/03/20
References
1. 1. Neptune RR, Kautz SA, Zajac FE. The contributions of the individual ankle plantar flexors to support, forward progression and swing initiation during walking. J Biomech. 2001;34(11):1387-98. [DOI:10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00105-1] [PMID]
2. Kim CM, Eng JJ. The relationship of lower-extremity muscle torque to locomotor performance in people with stroke. Phys Ther. 2003;83(1):49-57. [DOI:10.1093/ptj/83.1.49]
3. Anderson DE, Madigan ML. Healthy older adults have insufficient hip range of motion and plantar flexor strength to walk like healthy young adults. J Biomech. 2014;47(5):1104-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.12.024] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Hébert-Losier K, Newsham-West RJ, Schneiders AG, Sullivan SJ. Raising the standards of the calf-raise test: a systematic review. J Sci Med Sport. 2009;12(6):594-602. [DOI:10.1016/j.jsams.2008.12.628] [PMID]
5. DA. N. Kinesiology Of The Musculoskeletal System: Foundations For Rehabilitation, 2e: Mosby; . 2 ed: Mosby; 2009.
6. Takahashi KZ, Gross MT, van Werkhoven H, Piazza SJ, Sawicki GS. Adding Stiffness to the Foot Modulates Soleus Force-Velocity Behaviour during Human Walking. Sci Rep. 2016;6:29870. [DOI:10.1038/srep29870] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Beasley WC. Quantitative muscle testing: principles and applications to research and clinical services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1961;42:398-425.
8. Silbernagel KG, Gustavsson A, Thomeé R, Karlsson J. Evaluation of lower leg function in patients with Achilles tendinopathy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(11):1207-17. [DOI:10.1007/s00167-006-0150-6] [PMID]
9. Horstmann T, Lukas C, Merk J, Brauner T, Mündermann A. Deficits 10-years after Achilles tendon repair. Int J Sports Med. 2012;33(6):474-9. [DOI:10.1055/s-0032-1301932] [PMID]
10. Kröönström LA, Johansson L, Zetterström AK, Dellborg M, Eriksson P, Cider Å. Muscle function in adults with congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiol. 2014;170(3):358-63. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.11.014] [PMID]
11. Hébert-Losier K, Wessman C, Alricsson M, Svantesson U. Updated reliability and normative values for the standing heel-rise test in healthy adults. Physiotherapy. 2017;103(4):446-52. [DOI:10.1016/j.physio.2017.03.002] [PMID]
12. Byrne C, Keene DJ, Lamb SE, Willett K. Intrarater reliability and agreement of linear encoder derived heel-rise endurance test outcome measures in healthy adults. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2017;36:34-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.07.004] [PMID]
13. Zellers JA, Baxter JR, Grävare Silbernagel K. Functional Ankle Range of Motion but Not Peak Achilles Tendon Force Diminished With Heel-Rise and Jumping Tasks After Achilles Tendon Repair. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(9):2439-46. [DOI:10.1177/03635465211019436] [PMID] [PMCID]
14. Monteiro DP, Britto RR, Fregonezi GAF, Dias FAL, Silva MGD, Pereira DAG. Reference values for the bilateral heel-rise test. Braz J Phys Ther. 2017;21(5):344-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.06.002] [PMID] [PMCID]
15. Pires IM, Ponciano V, Garcia NM, Zdravevski E. Analysis of the Results of Heel-Rise Test with Sensors: A Systematic Review. Electronics [Internet]. 2020; 9(7). [DOI:10.3390/electronics9071154]
16. Tengman T, Coleman S, Grävare Silbernagel K, Karlsson J, Riad J. Muscle fatigue after Achilles tendon rupture: a limited heel-rise test with electromyography reveals decreased endurance. European Journal of Physiotherapy. 2015;17(4):200-7. [DOI:10.3109/21679169.2015.1078842]
17. Majumder S, Deen MJ. Smartphone Sensors for Health Monitoring and Diagnosis. Sensors (Basel). 2019;19(9). [DOI:10.3390/s19092164] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. S. Od. Smartphone users worldwide 2016-2023: Statista; 2021 [Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/330695/number-of-smartphone-users-worldwide/.
19. Bogataj Š, Pajek M, Andrašić S, Trajković N. Concurrent Validity and Reliability of My Jump 2 App for Measuring Vertical Jump Height in Recreationally Active Adults. Applied Sciences [Internet]. 2020; 10(11). [DOI:10.3390/app10113805]
20. André HI, Carnide F, Borja E, Ramalho F, Santos-Rocha R, Veloso AP. Calf-raise senior: a new test for assessment of plantar flexor muscle strength in older adults: protocol, validity, and reliability. Clin Interv Aging. 2016;11:1661-74. [DOI:10.2147/CIA.S115304] [PMID] [PMCID]
21. Hermens H, Freriks B, Merletti R, Stegeman DF, Blok JH, Rau G, et al., editors. European recommendations for surface electromyography: Results of the SENIAM Project1999.
22. Balsalobre-Fernández C, Marchante D, Muñoz-López M, Jiménez SL. Validity and reliability of a novel iPhone app for the measurement of barbell velocity and 1RM on the bench-press exercise. J Sports Sci. 2018;36(1):64-70. [DOI:10.1080/02640414.2017.1280610] [PMID]
23. Balsalobre-Fernández C, Geiser G, Krzyszkowski J, Kipp K. Validity and reliability of a computer-vision-based smartphone app for measuring barbell trajectory during the snatch. J Sports Sci. 2020;38(6):710-6. [DOI:10.1080/02640414.2020.1729453] [PMID]
24. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2010;47(8):931-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.10.001]
25. LG. P. Foundations of clinical research: applications to evidence-based practice: F.A. Davis Company; 2020.
26. Jacobson NS, Truax P. Clinical significance : A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Methodological issues & strategies in clinical research. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association; 1992. p. 631-48. [DOI:10.1037/10109-042]
27. Haber M, Golan E, Azoulay L, Kahn SR, Shrier I. Reliability of a device measuring triceps surae muscle fatigability. Br J Sports Med. 2004;38(2):163-7. [DOI:10.1136/bjsm.2002.002899] [PMID] [PMCID]
28. Sman AD, Hiller CE, Imer A, Ocsing A, Burns J, Refshauge KM. Design and reliability of a novel heel rise test measuring device for plantarflexion endurance. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:391646. [DOI:10.1155/2014/391646] [PMID] [PMCID]
29. Yocum A, McCoy SW, Bjornson KF, Mullens P, Burton GN. Reliability and validity of the standing heel-rise test. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2010;30(3):190-204. [DOI:10.1111/medu.13935] [PMID:31452222] [DOI:10.1111/medu.13935] [PMID]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
