Volume 12 - Spring Supplementary
Ann Appl Sport Sci 2024, 12 - Spring Supplementary: 0-0 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Oktadinata A, Subarjah H, Komarudin, Hidayat Y. Young Women's Motor Competence and Sport Satisfaction: The Role of Self-Efficacy in Physical Education. Ann Appl Sport Sci 2024; 12
URL: http://aassjournal.com/article-1-1251-en.html
URL: http://aassjournal.com/article-1-1251-en.html
1- Department of Sport Coaching Education, Universitas Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia. , alek_oktadinata@unja.ac.id
2- Department of Sport Science, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia.
3- Department of Sport Coaching Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia.
4- Department of Physical Education, Health, and Recreation, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia.
2- Department of Sport Science, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia.
3- Department of Sport Coaching Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia.
4- Department of Physical Education, Health, and Recreation, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia.
Abstract: (710 Views)
Background. Low basic movement skills Based on the results of the Indonesian Sports Development Index, one of the causes of the decline in basic movement skills is the low quality of physical education learning.
Objectives. The purpose of this study was to test the integration of Self-efficacy (SE) in Physical Education (PE) towards increasing the mastery of motor skills and the level of student satisfaction.
Methods. This research uses an experimental method with a two-group pretest-posttest design approach. The population in this study was female students of SMA Negeri 5 Jambi City. The sample determination in this study used two types, namely cluster random sampling and random assignment. Using cluster random sampling, second-level students were obtained from three levels and the random assignment was obtained from four classes (two classes for treatment and two classes for control) and obtained N treatment=49 and N control=50. The instruments used were Get Skilled Get Active to assess movement skills and the Basic Needs Satisfaction in Sport Scale (BNSSS) to measure satisfaction.
Results. The results of this study are that there is a significant effect There is a significant difference in the effect of non-integrated and integrated group SE on PE learning of basic movement skills (x x x x
Conclusion. The SE integration of the PE group was better than the non-integrated group in learning in increasing the mastery of movement skills and the level of student sports satisfaction. In integrating self-efficacy in physical education learning, cognitive, motivational, affective, and selection processes occur which can influence human function and are carried out to realize goals that are considered valuable, in this case, basic movement skills.
Objectives. The purpose of this study was to test the integration of Self-efficacy (SE) in Physical Education (PE) towards increasing the mastery of motor skills and the level of student satisfaction.
Methods. This research uses an experimental method with a two-group pretest-posttest design approach. The population in this study was female students of SMA Negeri 5 Jambi City. The sample determination in this study used two types, namely cluster random sampling and random assignment. Using cluster random sampling, second-level students were obtained from three levels and the random assignment was obtained from four classes (two classes for treatment and two classes for control) and obtained N treatment=49 and N control=50. The instruments used were Get Skilled Get Active to assess movement skills and the Basic Needs Satisfaction in Sport Scale (BNSSS) to measure satisfaction.
Results. The results of this study are that there is a significant effect There is a significant difference in the effect of non-integrated and integrated group SE on PE learning of basic movement skills (
Conclusion. The SE integration of the PE group was better than the non-integrated group in learning in increasing the mastery of movement skills and the level of student sports satisfaction. In integrating self-efficacy in physical education learning, cognitive, motivational, affective, and selection processes occur which can influence human function and are carried out to realize goals that are considered valuable, in this case, basic movement skills.
Full-Text [PDF 903 kb]
(351 Downloads)
APPLICABLE REMARKS
APPLICABLE REMARKS
- This program should be developed to increase the motor skill level and satisfaction of secondary school students.
- This research confirms that a well-designed SE integration program in PE learning improves the movement skills and satisfaction of high school students.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Motor Control and its Related Branches
Received: 2023/09/1 | Accepted: 2023/10/21
Received: 2023/09/1 | Accepted: 2023/10/21
References
1. 1. Logan SW, Barnett LM, Goodway JD, Stodden DF. Comparison of performance on process- and product-oriented assessments of fundamental motor skills across childhood. J Sports Sci. 2017;35(7):634-41. [DOI:10.1080/02640414.2016.1183803] [PMID]
2. De Meester A, Stodden D, Brian A, True L, Cardon G, Tallir I, et al. Associations among Elementary School Children's Actual Motor Competence, Perceived Motor Competence, Physical Activity and BMI: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS One. 2016;11(10):e0164600. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0164600] [PMID] [PMCID]
3. Webster EK, Martin CK, Staiano AE. Fundamental motor skills, screen-time, and physical activity in preschoolers. Journal of Sport and Health Science. 2019;8(2):114-21. [DOI:10.1016/j.jshs.2018.11.006] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Babic MJ, Morgan PJ, Plotnikoff RC, Lonsdale C, White RL, Lubans DR. Physical activity and physical self-concept in youth: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2014;44(11):1589-601. [DOI:10.1007/s40279-014-0229-z] [PMID]
5. T. C. Mutohir, A. Maksum, A. Kristiyanto, R. Akbar. Laporan Nasional Sports Development Index Tahun 2021: Olahraga Untuk Investasi Pembangunan Manusia Mental model View project construction of sports development index View project. 2022. [Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359443662].
6. T. C. Mutohir, A. Maksum, R. Akbar. Laporan Nasional Sports Development Index 2022: Olahraga, Daya Saing, dan Kebijakan Berbasis Data The Effectiveness Of Communication Of Subordinates To Superiors (Optimizing Gadget) View project Mental model View project. 2023. [Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369183715].
7. Pambudi MI, Winarno M, Dwiyogo WD. Perencanaan dan pelaksanaan pembelajaran pendidikan jasmani olahraga kesehatan. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan. 2019;4(1):110-6. [DOI:10.17977/jptpp.v4i1.11906]
8. Sallis JF, McKenzie TL, Beets MW, Beighle A, Erwin H, Lee S. Physical Education's Role in Public Health. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2012;83(2):125-35.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2012.10599842 [DOI:10.5641/027013612800745329] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Bailey R, Armour K, Kirk D, Jess M, Pickup I, Sandford R, et al. The educational benefits claimed for physical education and school sport: an academic review. Research Papers in Education. 2009;24(1):1-27. [DOI:10.1080/02671520701809817]
10. Barnett L, Hinkley T, Okely AD, Salmon J. Child, family and environmental correlates of children's motor skill proficiency. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2013;16(4):332-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.jsams.2012.08.011] [PMID]
11. Bailey R, Cope E, DAN P. The Human Capital Model: realising the benefits of sport and physical activity. Sport, Education and Social Policy: Routledge; 2016. p. 155-79. [DOI:10.4324/9781315404868-18]
12. Hands B, Larkin D, Cantell MH, Rose E. Male and female differences in health benefits derived from physical activity: implications for exercise prescription. Journal of Womens Health, Issues and Care. 2016;5(4). [DOI:10.4172/2325-9795.1000238]
13. Fuchs R. Physical activity and health: Elsevier; 2015. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.14115-7]
14. Salim DLF. Aksesibilitas Pembiayaan Kesehatan Dalam Program Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional. Lex Et Societatis. 2020;8(4). [DOI:10.35796/les.v8i4.30915]
15. Kemenkes R. Enam Isu Kesehatan Jadi Fokus Kemenkes di Tahun 2021. Kementerian Kesehatan. 2021.
16. Amnie AG. An Investigation of Predictors of Self-efficacy to Cope with Stress and Implications for Health Education Practice. American Journal of Health Education. 2018;49(3):155-65. [DOI:10.1080/19325037.2018.1431165]
17. Mendoza-Vasconez AS, Marquez B, Benitez TJ, Marcus BH. Psychometrics of the self-efficacy for physical activity scale among a Latina women sample. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1097. [DOI:10.1186/s12889-018-5998-0] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Marshman EM, Kalender ZY, Nokes-Malach T, Schunn C, Singh C. Female students with A's have similar physics self-efficacy as male students with C's in introductory courses: A cause for alarm? Physical review physics education research. 2018;14(2):020123. [DOI:10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.020123]
19. Doménech-Betoret F, Abellán-Roselló L, Gómez-Artiga A. Self-Efficacy, Satisfaction, and Academic Achievement: The Mediator Role of Students' Expectancy-Value Beliefs. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1193. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01193] [PMID] [PMCID]
20. Sun X. Psychological empowerment on job performance-mediating effect of job satisfaction. Psychology. 2016;7(04):584. [DOI:10.4236/psych.2016.74060]
21. Roth JL, Brooks-Gunn J. What Exactly Is a Youth Development Program? Answers From Research and Practice. Applied Developmental Science. 2003;7(2):94-111. [DOI:10.1207/S1532480XADS0702_6]
22. Rojas M. Life satisfaction and satisfaction in domains of life: is it a simple relationship? Journal of Happiness Studies. 2006;7(4):467-97. [DOI:10.1007/s10902-006-9009-2]
23. Baudin N, Blanch Plana A, Rolland J-P, Martí Guiu M, Aluja Fabregat A. Core Self-Evaluations, life satisfaction, and sport satisfaction. Escritos de Psicología, 2014, vol 7, núm 3, p 19-24. 2014. [DOI:10.24310/espsiescpsi.v7i3.13265]
24. Melin R, Fugl-Meyer KS, Fugl-Meyer AR. Life satisfaction in 18- to 64-year-old Swedes: in relation to education, employment situation, health and physical activity. J Rehabil Med. 2003;35(2):84-90. [DOI:10.1080/16501970306119] [PMID]
25. Morales-Sánchez V, Hernández-Martos J, Reigal RE, Morillo-Baro JP, Caballero-Cerbán M, Hernández-Mendo A. Physical Self-Concept and Motor Self-Efficacy Are Related to Satisfaction/Enjoyment and Boredom in Physical Education Classes. Sustainability [Internet]. 2021; 13(16). [DOI:10.3390/su13168829]
26. Kalajas-Tilga H, Koka A, Hein V, Tilga H, Raudsepp L. Motivational processes in physical education and objectively measured physical activity among adolescents. Journal of Sport and Health Science. 2020;9(5):462-71. [DOI:10.1016/j.jshs.2019.06.001] [PMID] [PMCID]
27. Fraenkel JR, Wallen NE, Hyun HH. How to design and evaluate research in education: McGraw-hill New York; 2012.
28. Pineda-Espejel HA, López Gaspar I, Guimaraes AC, Martínez Zavala S, Morquecho-Sánchez R, Morales-Sánchez V, et al. Psychometric Properties of a Spanish Version of the Basic Needs Satisfaction in Sports Scale. Front Psychol. 2019;10:2816. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02816] [PMID] [PMCID]
29. Kelly L, O'Connor S, Harrison AJ, Ní Chéilleachair NJ. Does fundamental movement skill proficiency vary by sex, class group or weight status? Evidence from an Irish primary school setting. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2019;37(9):1055-63. [DOI:10.1080/02640414.2018.1543833] [PMID]
30. Bollen KA, Stine RA. Bootstrapping Goodness-of-Fit Measures in Structural Equation Models. Sociological Methods & Research. 1992;21(2):205-29. [DOI:10.1177/0049124192021002004]
31. Kendellen K, Camiré M, Bean CN, Forneris T, Thompson J. Integrating life skills into Golf Canada's youth programs: Insights into a successful research to practice partnership. Journal of Sport Psychology in Action. 2017;8(1):34-46. [DOI:10.1080/21520704.2016.1205699]
32. Payne VG, Isaacs LD. Human motor development: A lifespan approach: Routledge; 2017. [DOI:10.4324/9781315213040]
33. Breslin G, Murphy M, McKee D, Delaney B, Dempster M. The effect of teachers trained in a fundamental movement skills programme on children's self-perceptions and motor competence. European Physical Education Review. 2012;18(1):114-26. [DOI:10.1177/1356336X11430657]
34. Hattie J, Timperley H. The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research. 2007;77(1):81-112. [DOI:10.3102/003465430298487]
35. Ickes MJ, Sharma M. A systematic review of physical activity interventions in Hispanic adults. J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:156435. [DOI:10.1155/2012/156435] [PMID] [PMCID]
36. Weinberg R, Gould D, Jackson A. Expectations and Performance: An Empirical Test of Bandura's Self-efficacy Theory. Journal of Sport Psychology. 1979;1(4):320-31. [DOI:10.1123/jsp.1.4.320]
37. Sheeran P, Maki A, Montanaro E, Avishai-Yitshak A, Bryan A, Klein WM, et al. The impact of changing attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy on health-related intentions and behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2016;35(11):1178-88. [DOI:10.1037/hea0000387] [PMID]
38. Oktadinata A, Nugraha U, Yuliawan E. Integration of self-efficacy in digital-based physical training in increasing physical activity of young women. Journal Sport Area. 2023;8(1):131-40. [DOI:10.25299/sportarea.2023.vol8(1).10578]
39. P. Abu, A. Oktadinata. Develop gross motor skills in kindergarten students through modification games. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran. 2020;6(3):575-87.
40. Chen IS. Computer self-efficacy, learning performance, and the mediating role of learning engagement. Computers in Human Behavior. 2017;72:362-70. [DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.059]
41. Roick J, Ringeisen T. Students' math performance in higher education: Examining the role of self-regulated learning and self-efficacy. Learning and Individual Differences. 2018;65:148-58. [DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2018.05.018]
42. Guo YM, Klein BD, Ro YK. On the effects of student interest, self-efficacy, and perceptions of the instructor on flow, satisfaction, and learning outcomes. Studies in Higher Education. 2020;45(7):1413-30. [DOI:10.1080/03075079.2019.1593348]
43. Jenkins JS, Bugeja AD, Barber LK. More Content or More Policy? A Closer Look at Syllabus Detail, Instructor Gender, and Perceptions of Instructor Effectiveness. College Teaching. 2014;62(4):129-35. [DOI:10.1080/87567555.2014.935700]
44. LaBarbera R. The Relationship between Students' Perceived Sense of Connectedness to the Instructor and Satisfaction in Online Courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education. 2013;14(4):209-20.
45. Hong J-C, Hwang M-Y, Szeto E, Tsai C-R, Kuo Y-C, Hsu W-Y. Internet cognitive failure relevant to self-efficacy, learning interest, and satisfaction with social media learning. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016;55:214-22. [DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.010]
46. Goodboy AK, Myers SA. The Effect of Teacher Confirmation on Student Communication and Learning Outcomes. Communication Education. 2008;57(2):153-79. [DOI:10.1080/03634520701787777]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
