Articles In Press / Online First
Back to the articles list |
Back to browse issues page
1- Faculty of Sport Sciences, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey. , 216303006@kocaeli.edu.tr
2- Faculty of Sport Sciences, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.
2- Faculty of Sport Sciences, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Abstract: (791 Views)
Background. In both individual and team sports, various internal and external factors influence individuals to engage in these sports. These factors also play a role in the coach-athlete relationship.
Objectives. The aim of this study is to investigate the coach-athlete relationship and the factors influencing participation motivation for both individual and team athletes.
Methods. The study included 100 male and female amateur athletes between the ages of 14 and 18. Participants were administered a personal information form (gender, age, education level, sports discipline, years of participation), a coach-athlete relationship scale, and a participation motivation scale. SPSS 25.00 software package was used for data analysis.
Results. The analysis revealed a significant relationship in favor of individual sports in the coach-athlete relationship's common goal (p=0.010) and trust sub-dimensions (p=0.28), while a significant relationship in favor of team sports was found in the friendship sub-dimension of participation motivation (p=0.14).
Conclusion. As a result, it is believed that the factors influencing individuals' participation in sports and the communication established by the coach with the athletes will play an important role in both participation motivation and the success of the athletes.
Objectives. The aim of this study is to investigate the coach-athlete relationship and the factors influencing participation motivation for both individual and team athletes.
Methods. The study included 100 male and female amateur athletes between the ages of 14 and 18. Participants were administered a personal information form (gender, age, education level, sports discipline, years of participation), a coach-athlete relationship scale, and a participation motivation scale. SPSS 25.00 software package was used for data analysis.
Results. The analysis revealed a significant relationship in favor of individual sports in the coach-athlete relationship's common goal (p=0.010) and trust sub-dimensions (p=0.28), while a significant relationship in favor of team sports was found in the friendship sub-dimension of participation motivation (p=0.14).
Conclusion. As a result, it is believed that the factors influencing individuals' participation in sports and the communication established by the coach with the athletes will play an important role in both participation motivation and the success of the athletes.
Full-Text [PDF 282 kb]
(363 Downloads)
APPLICABLE REMARKS
APPLICABLE REMARKS
- Positive motivation and effective communication contribute to individuals being more successful in their sports lives, enabling them to reach their goals and objectives more accurately.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Sport Psychology and its Related Branches
Received: 2024/01/28 | Accepted: 2024/03/26
Received: 2024/01/28 | Accepted: 2024/03/26
References
1. 1. Güney S. Davranış bilimleri. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık. 2000.
2. Tiryaki S. Spor psikolojisi, kavramlar kuramlar ve uygulama. Ankara: Eylül Kitap ve Yayınevi. 2000.
3. Koçel T. İşletme yöneticiliği. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları. 2003.
4. Abadi PM. The role of team cohesion in success: a literature review from a psychological perspective Health Nexus. 2023;1(4):81-89. [DOI:10.61838/kman.hn.1.4.10]
5. Navabinejad S. and Rostami M. Mind and body in sync:the fascinating field of psychophysiology in sports. Health Nexus. 2023;1(3):38-40. [DOI:10.61838/kman.hn.1.3.5]
6. Türkmen M. Profesyonel erkek futbolcular ile amatör erkek futbolcuların başarı motivasyon düzeylerinin incelenmesi, (İzmir-Manisa örneği). Yayınlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Celal Bayar Üniversitesi, Türkiye. 2005.
7. Selçuk Z. Eğitim psikolojisi. Ankara: Pegem. 1996.
8. Doğan O. Spor psikolojisi. Adana: Nobel Kitabevi. 2005.
9. Konter E. Sporda motivasyon. İzmir: Saray Tıp Kitapevi. 1995.
10. Kazak Z. Reliability and validity study of motivational behavior in sports -SGÖ- for Turkish athletes. Hacettepe Journal of Sports Sciences. 2004;4:191-206.
11. Çetin M. The role of gender and parental attitudes upon the sports participation motivation among the table tennis players who studied at the university. International Journal of Academic Research. 2013;5(1):136-142. [DOI:10.7813/2075-4124.2013/5-1/B.23]
12. Şirin EF. and Hamamioğlu Ö. Determining the sports participation motivations of young athletes in Far Eastern sports branches (Taekwondo, Karate, Judo). Gazi Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences. 2007;12(2):29-42.
13. Dwyer M and John J. Internal structure of perticipation motivation questionnaire completed by undergraduates. Psyhological Reports. 1992;70:290. [DOI:10.2466/pr0.1992.70.1.283]
14. Flood SE and Hellsdetd JC. Gender differences in motivation of intercollegiate athletic participation. Journal of Sport Behavior. 1991;14:159.
15. Gill K and Overdorf V. Incentives to exercise in younger and older women. Journal of Sport Behavior. 1994;17:87-89.
16. Güllü SA. Research on athletes' coach-athlete relationship and sportsmanship orientations. Sportmetre Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences. 2018;16(4):190-204.
17. Güllü S, Yıldız SM and Saydam H. Examining the effect of the coach-athlete relationship on boxers' sportsmanship orientation (fair play behavior). International Journal of Current Educational Research. 2001;7(2):500-510.
18. Jowett S and Meek GA. The coach-athlete relationship in married couples: An exploratory content analysis. The Sport Psychologist. 2000;14:157-175. [DOI:10.1123/tsp.14.2.157]
19. Antonini PR and Seiler R. Closeness, co-orientation and complementarity in coach-athlete relationships: what male swimmers say about their male coaches. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2006;7:159-171. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2005.08.004]
20. Altıntaş A, Çetinkalp Z and Aşçı H. Evaluation of the coach-athlete relationship: validity and reliability study. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2005;23(3):119-128.
21. Jowett S and Cockerill IM. Olympic medallists perspective of the athlete-coach Rrelationship. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2003;4:313-331. [DOI:10.1016/S1469-0292(02)00011-0]
22. Short SE, Short MW. Essay role of the coach in the coach-athlete relationship. Medicine and Sport. 2005;366:529-530. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67836-1] [PMID]
23. Güllü S and Şahin S. A research on the sportsmanship orientation levels of national wrestlers. Turkish Studies. 2018;13(18):705-718. [DOI:10.7827/TurkishStudies.14152]
24. Yılmaz İ, Çimen Z and Bektaş F. Comparison of communication skill levels of individual and team sports coaches according to athlete perceptions. Atatürk University Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences. 2009;(4):45-48.
25. Ekenci G, Yücel MG and Ekenci MT. Validity and reliability analysis of the coach-athlete relationship scale for Türkiye. The Journal of Academic Social Science. 2019;40(40).
26. Oyar BZ, Asçı FH, Çelebi M and Mülazimoğlu Ö. Validity and reliability study of the sports participation motivation scale. Hacettepe Journal of Sports Sciences. 2001;12(2):21-32.
27. Jowett S and Ntoumanis N. The coach-athlete relationship questionnaire (CART-Q): development and initial validation. Scandavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports. 2004;24:245-257. [DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2003.00338.x] [PMID]
28. Adie JW and Jowett S. Meta-perceptions of the coach-athlete relationship, achievement goals, and intrinsic motivation among sport participants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2010;40(11):2750-2773. [DOI:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00679.x]
29. Jowett S. The coach-athlete partnership. The Psychologist. 2005;18(7):412-415.
30. Abakay U. Futbolcu antrenör iletişiminin farklı statülerdeki futbolcuların başarı motivasyonuyla ilişkisi. Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Türkiye. 2010.
31. Abakay U and Kuru E. The relationship between communication level with the coach and success motivation in female football players. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences. 2013;12(1):20-33.
32. Tolukan E and Akyel Y. A research on coach-athlete relationship and continuous sports self-confidence in football. Spormetre Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences. 2019;17(1):103-112. [DOI:10.33689/spormetre.529669]
33. Öztürk A, Bayazıt B and Gencer E. Examining the problem solving skills and sports confidence levels of judokas (Trabzon Olympic preparation center example). Spormetre Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences. 2016;14(2):145-151.
34. Rhind DJA, Jowett S and Yang SX. A comparison of athletes' perceptions of the coachathlete relationship in team and individual sports. Journal of Sport Behavior. 2012;35(4).
35. Lorimer R and Jowett S. Empathic accuracy in coach-athlete dyads who participate in team and individual sports. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2009;10(1):152-158. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.06.004]
36. Konter E. Antrenörlük ve takım psikolojisi, Ankara: Palme Yayıncılık. 2004.
37. Hausenblas HA, Brewer BW and Van Raalte JL. Self-Presentation and exercise. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 2004;16(1):3-18. [DOI:10.1080/10413200490260026]
38. Şirin EF. Determination of sports participation motivations of football girls (12-15 years old). Spormetre Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences. 2008;6(1):1-7.
39. Aygün M and Yetim AA. Reasons for ice hockey players aged 16-20 in Ankara to participate in the sport. Journal of Education and Social Research. 2015;2(1):1-11.
40. Temel V and Nas K. Motivation for participation in sports; Reasons for participation in sports and exercise by high school students participating in school sports. İnönü University Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences. 2021;8(2):33-49.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
