Volume 12 - Autumn Supplementary                   Ann Appl Sport Sci 2024, 12 - Autumn Supplementary: 0-0 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Karaman Cam M, Ayyıldız Durhan T, Turkmen E. Sports Spectatorship As a Leisure Activity: The Role of Leisure Literacy in Predicting Motives. Ann Appl Sport Sci 2024; 12
URL: http://aassjournal.com/article-1-1379-en.html
1- Faculty of Sports Sciences, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye
2- Faculty of Sports Sciences, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye , ecemturkmen@gazi.edu.tr
Abstract:   (346 Views)
Background. The study investigates the effect of leisure time literacy on the extrinsic and intrinsic motives of individuals who watch sports matches as a leisure time activity.
Objectives. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the relationship between leisure time literacy and the extrinsic and intrinsic motives of sports spectators.
Methods. The research group consisted of 498 sports spectators, 412 males, and 86 females, selected by random sampling method in Ankara province, who voluntarily agreed to participate in the study and whose average age was 29.41±2.53. The Leisure Time Literacy Scale (LLS), Extrinsic Motivation Scale for Sports Spectators (SSEMS), and Intrinsic Motivation Scale for Sports Spectators (SSIMS) were used to collect the research data.
Results. According to the results of the analysis, it is seen that the participants' leisure time literacy levels are above the middle level, and their extrinsic motives and intrinsic motives as sports spectators are high. Among the independent variables, significant differences were found in terms of gender, being a member of a fan club, and self-identification as a sports spectator. A moderate positive relationship was found between LL levels and SSEM and SSIM levels. In addition, leisure time literacy is a significant predictor of extrinsic and intrinsic motives.
Conclusion. As a result, as the level of leisure literacy increases, extrinsic motives and intrinsic motives increase. Leisure literacy can help interpret the intrinsic and extrinsic motives of sports spectators.
Full-Text [PDF 778 kb]   (150 Downloads)    
 
 
APPLICABLE REMARKS
• In addition, a mixed method can be applied to a study examining leisure literacy and motivational dynamics among sports spectators.
• This approach can provide an in-depth understanding of leisure literacy and the motivational dynamics of sports spectators from both quantitative and qualitative perspectives.

Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Sport Psychology and its Related Branches
Received: 2024/04/9 | Accepted: 2024/06/23

References
1. 1. Gemar A. Social capital networks in sports spectatorship and participation. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. 2021;56(4):514-36. [DOI:10.1177/1012690220940867]
2. Aytaç Ö. Kapitalizm ve boş zaman. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2005;6(1):1-22.
3. Aycan A, Polat E, Yılmaz U. Takım özdeşleşme düzeyi ile profesyonel futbol müsabakalarına seyirci olarak katılım kararını etkileyen değişkenler arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 2009;7(4):169-74. [DOI:10.1501/Sporm_0000000167]
4. De Haan D, Faull A, Kohe GZ. Celebrating the social in soccer: spectators' experiences of the forgotten (Blind) Football World Cup. Soccer & Society. 2014;15(4):578-95. [DOI:10.1080/14660970.2013.828596]
5. Madrigal R. Investigating an evolving leisure experience: Antecedents and consequences of spectator affect during a live sporting event. Journal of leisure research. 2003;35(1):23-48. [DOI:10.18666/jlr-2003-v35-i1-609]
6. Grove SJ, Dorsch MJ, Hopkins CD. Assessing the longitudinal robustness of spectators' perceptions of the functions of sport: Implications for sport marketers. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice. 2012;20(1):23-38. [DOI:10.2753/MTP1069-6679200102]
7. Wang C, Matsuoka H. Motives of sport spectators. Sports management and sports humanities. 2015:47-60. [DOI:10.1007/978-4-431-55324-3_4]
8. Kim J, Kim Y, Kim D. Improving well-being through hedonic, eudaimonic, and social needs fulfillment in sport media consumption. Sport Management Review. 2017;20(3):309-21. [DOI:10.1016/j.smr.2016.10.001]
9. Keyes H, Gradidge S, Gibson N, Harvey A, Roeloffs S, Zawisza M, Forwood S. Attending live sporting events predicts subjective wellbeing and reduces loneliness. Frontiers in Public Health. 2023;10:989706. [DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.989706] [PMID] []
10. Ullah F, Wu Y, Mehmood K, Jabeen F, Iftikhar Y, Acevedo-Duque Á, Kwan HK. Impact of spectators' perceptions of corporate social responsibility on regional attachment in sports: Three-wave indirect effects of spectators' pride and team identification. Sustainability. 2021;13(2):597. [DOI:10.3390/su13020597]
11. Kim S, Morgan A, Assaker G. Examining the relationship between sport spectator motivation, involvement, and loyalty: A structural model in the context of Australian Rules football. Sport in Society. 2021;24(6):1006-32. [DOI:10.1080/17430437.2020.1720658]
12. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior: Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.
13. Tsorbatzoudis H, Alexandres K, Zahariadis P, Grouios G. Examining the relationship between recreational sport participation and intrinsic and extrinsic motivation and amotivation. Perceptual and motor skills. 2006;103(2):363-74. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.103.2.363-374 [DOI:10.2466/PMS.103.6.363-374] [PMID]
14. Vallerand RJ, Grouzet F. Pour un modèle hiérarchique de la motivation intrinsèque et extrinsèque dans les pratiques sportives et l'activité physique. Théories de la motivation et pratiques sportives: état des recherches. 2001:57-95. [DOI:10.3917/puf.sarr.2001.01.0057]
15. Durhan TA. Rekreasyon Okuryazarlığı. In: Sabri Kaya BMA, Ali Selman Özdemir, Suat Karaküçük, editor. Rekreasyon Bilimi 3. Ankara: Gazi Kitapevi; 2023. p. 181-201.
16. Karasar N. Scientific research method: Concepts-principles-techniques. Ankara: Nobel Publication Distribution; 2017.
17. Arslan S. Developing a leisure literacy scale in the context of adult education: validity and reliability study. The Journal of International Education Science. 2018(14):101-16.
18. Polat E, Yalçın HB. Spor seyircileri için dışsal ve içsel güdü ölçekleri kısa versiyon uyarlaması ve çok değişkenli ilişkisel bir uygulama. Spor Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2020;5(1):111-29. [DOI:10.25307/jssr.744732]
19. Wann DL, Branscombe NR. Sports fans: Measuring degree of identification with their team. International journal of sport psychology. 1993(24):1-17.
20. Funk DC, James J. The psychological continuum model: A conceptual framework for understanding an individual's psychological connection to sport. Sport management review. 2001;4(2):119-50. [DOI:10.1016/S1441-3523(01)70072-1]
21. Csikszentmihalyi M. Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York City: Basic Books; 1997.
22. Friedman C, Iso-Ahola IE. Leisure and well-being. Massachusetts: Venture Publishing; 2008.
23. Gau L-S, James JD. A ten-value-type framework associated with spectator sports: A qualitative inquiry. Sage open. 2013;3(2):1-13. [DOI:10.1177/2158244013485580]
24. Kim YK, Trail G. Constraints and motivators: A new model to explain sport consumer behavior. Journal of Sport Management. 2010;24(2):190-210. [DOI:10.1123/jsm.24.2.190]
25. Palik M, Abdi K. The relationship between watching sport events and spectators' engagement in physical activities. Pedagogics, psychology, medical-biological problems of physical training and sports. 2018(6):320-7. [DOI:10.15561/18189172.2018.0607]
26. Yargic M, Kurklu G. Are adolescent sports fans more physically active than the sports indifferent? A self-reported questionnaire study. Perspectives in Public Health. 2020;140(2):117-23. [DOI:10.1177/1757913919868247] [PMID]
27. He X, editor Investigation of Determinants and Constraints of Fan and Participant Engagement in Sport Events. 2022 7th International Conference on Financial Innovation and Economic Development (ICFIED 2022); 2022: Atlantis Press. [DOI:10.2991/aebmr.k.220307.535]
28. Lee C, Bang H. Comparison of division I and division III intercollegiate spectators: Motives and constraints. International Journal of Leisure and Tourism Marketing. 2011;2(2):159-75. [DOI:10.1504/IJLTM.2011.038887]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Annals of Applied Sport Science

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb