Volume 8 - Autumn Supplementary                   Ann Appl Sport Sci 2020, 8 - Autumn Supplementary: 0-0 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Badami R. Effect of Type of Feedback on Intrinsic Motivation and Learning of Volleyball Jump Serve in Students with Different Levels of Neuroticism. Ann Appl Sport Sci. 2020; 8 (S1)
URL: http://aassjournal.com/article-1-821-en.html
Department of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran , rokhsareh.badami@khuisf.ac.ir
Abstract:   (1130 Views)
Background. Several researchers have studied the effects of type of feedback on learning motor skills, but there are few studies on the interaction between personality traits and the type of feedback.
Objectives. This study aimed at investigating the effect of type of feedback on intrinsic motivation and learning volleyball jump serve in students with neuroticism.
Methods. A total of 59 female-16-17 year old students were classified into 4 groups based on their psycho inventoryical neurosis and type of feedback. Research tools included NEO five factors and intrinsic motivation inventories. The participants’ goal was volleyball jump serving. In the acquisition phase, the participants performed 96 volleyball jump serves in four blocks of trials of 24. The retention test was conducted two weeks after the acquisition phase. Before and after the acquisition phase, participants completed the intrinsic motivation inventory.
Results. The type of feedback had an effect on acquisition (p=0.33), retention (p<0.001), and intrinsic motivation (p<0.001), and the positive normative feedback group had better intrinsic motivation and better learning than the negative normative feedback group. The effect of personality type on acquisition and intrinsic motivation was significant, and highly neurotic students (Score 81 to 105) had lower scores on acquisition phase and lower intrinsic motivation. However, the effect of personality type on retention scores was not significant.
Conclusion. Positive normative feedback for learning of the volleyball jump serve is better than negative normative feedback for beginners.
Full-Text [PDF 656 kb]   (279 Downloads)    
 
 
APPLICABLE REMARKS
  • Trainers use positive normative feedback to train the volleyball jump serve to create better learning in novice.
  • Trainers use positive normative feedback to train the volleyball jump serve to create more intrinsic motivation in novice.
  • Trainers should note that neuroticism affects intrinsic motivation.

Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Motor Control and its Related Branches
Received: 2019/11/6 | Accepted: 2020/03/6 | Published: 2020/10/19 | ePublished: 2020/10/19

References
1. Guadagnoli MA, Lee TD. Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. J Mot Behav. 2004;36(2):212-224. [DOI:10.3200/JMBR.36.2.212-224] [PMID]
2. Sanli EA, Lee TD. Nominal and functional task difficulty in skill acquisition: Effects on performance in two tests of transfer. Hum Mov Sci. 2015;41:218-229. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2015.03.006] [PMID]
3. Cantin N, Ryan J, Polatajko HJ. Impact of task difficulty and motor ability on visual-motor task performance of children with and without developmental coordination disorder. Hum Mov Sci. 2014;34:217-232. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2014.02.006] [PMID]
4. Badami R, VaezMousavi M, Wulf G, Namazizadeh M. Feedback after good versus poor trials affects intrinsic motivation. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2011;82(2):360-364. [DOI:10.1080/02701367.2011.10599765] [PMID]
5. Ávila LTG, Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Positive social-comparative feedback enhances motor learning in children. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2012;13(6):849-853. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.07.001]
6. Gonçalves GS, Cardozo PL, Valentini NC, Chiviacowsky S. Enhancing performance expectancies through positive comparative feedback facilitates the learning of basketball free throw in children. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2018;36:174-177. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.03.001]
7. Wulf G, Chiviacowsky S, Lewthwaite R. Normative feedback effects on learning a timing task. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2010;81(4):425-431. [DOI:10.1080/02701367.2010.10599703] [PMID]
8. Chauvel G, Wulf G, Maquestiaux F. Visual illusions can facilitate sport skill learning. Psychon Bull Rev. 2015;22(3):717-721. [DOI:10.3758/s13423-014-0744-9] [PMID]
9. Witt JK, Linkenauger SA, Proffitt DR. Get me out of this slump! Visual illusions improve sports performance. Psychol Sci. 2012;23(4):397-399. [DOI:10.1177/0956797611428810] [PMID]
10. Bargh JA, Chen M, Burrows L. Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;71(2):230-244. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.230] [PMID]
11. Olver JM, Mooradian TA. Personality traits and personal values: a conceptual and empirical integration. Personal Ind Differ. 2003;35(1):109-125. [DOI:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00145-9]
12. Kaefer A, Chiviacowsky S, Meira Cde M, Jr., Tani G. Self-controlled practice enhances motor learning in introverts and extroverts. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2014;85(2):226-233. [DOI:10.1080/02701367.2014.893051] [PMID]
13. McCrae RR, Costa PT. A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Personal Ind Differ 2004;36(3):587-596. [DOI:10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00118-1]
14. McKelvie SJ, Lemieux P, Stout D. Extraversion and neuroticism in contact athletes, no contact athletes and non-athletes: A research note. Athletic insight. 2003;5(3):19-27.
15. Bahmani B, Soukhtehzari S, Mazaherinezhad A, Sayyah M. Assessing Mental Skills of Student Athletes in a Colligate Sport Olympiad. Biosci Biotechnol Res Asia. 2015;12(Special-Edn2):527-531. [DOI:10.13005/bbra/2229]
16. Chavoshian M, Soukhtehzari S, Angoorani H, Rezaei M, Mansour S. Assessing and Comparing Mental Skills of Men Players' Positions in Volleyball Premier League Team of Iran. Sleep Hypn Int J. 2018;21(1):38-43. [DOI:10.5350/Sleep.Hypn.2019.21.0170]
17. Maia Bokums R, M. Meira Jr C, F. O. Neiva J, Oliveira T, Ferreira Maia J. Self-Controlled Feedback and Trait Anxiety in Motor Skill Acquisition. Psychol. 2012;03(05):406-409. [DOI:10.4236/psych.2012.35057]
18. Guadagnoli M, Lindquist K. Challenge Point Framework and Efficient Learning of Golf. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2016;2(1_suppl):185-197. [DOI:10.1260/174795407789705505]
19. Moshirian Farahi M, Asghari Ebrahimabad MJ, Gorji A, Bigdeli I. Psychometric Features of the Big-Five Personality Questionnaire for Children and Adolescence in Mashhad. Neurosci J Shefaye Khatam. 2019;7(1):13-22. [DOI:10.29252/shefa.7.1.13]
20. McAuley E, Duncan T, Tammen VV. Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1989;60(1):48-58. [DOI:10.1080/02701367.1989.10607413] [PMID]
21. Hosseini F, Norouzi E. The effect of neurofeedback training on self-talk and performance in elite and non-elite volleyball player. Med sport. 2017;70:000-000.
22. Hutchinson JC, Sherman T, Martinovic N, Tenenbaum G. The Effect of Manipulated Self-Efficacy on Perceived and Sustained Effort. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2008;20(4):457-472. [DOI:10.1080/10413200802351151]
23. Lewthwaite R, Wulf G. Social-comparative feedback affects motor skill learning. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010;63(4):738-749. [DOI:10.1080/17470210903111839] [PMID]
24. Arjmand M, Badami R. Effects of normative feedback on learning volleyball serves vitality during exercise and interest to continue sports participation. Sport Psychol. 2018;3(1):9-22.
25. Stoate I, Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Enhanced expectancies improve movement efficiency in runners. J Sports Sci. 2012;30(8):815-823. [DOI:10.1080/02640414.2012.671533] [PMID]
26. Badhwar NK. The Milgram Experiments, Learned Helplessness, and Character Traits. J Ethics. 2009;13(2-3):257-289. [DOI:10.1007/s10892-009-9052-4]
27. Gelbrich K. Anger, frustration, and helplessness after service failure: coping strategies and effective informational support. J Acad Mark Sci. 2009;38(5):567-585. [DOI:10.1007/s11747-009-0169-6]
28. Mikulincer M, Caspy T. The conceptualization of helplessness: II. Laboratory correlates of the phenomenological definition of helplessness. Motiva Emot. 1986;10(3):279-294. [DOI:10.1007/BF00992321]
29. Harter S. The construction of the self: Developmental and sociocultural foundations: Guilford Publications; 2015.
30. McKenzie J. Three superfactors in the 16PF and their relation to Eysenck's P, E and N. Person Ind Differ. 1988;9(5):843-850. [DOI:10.1016/0191-8869(88)90002-5]
31. Gulliver A, Griffiths KM, Christensen H. Barriers and facilitators to mental health help-seeking for young elite athletes: a qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12:157. [DOI:10.1186/1471-244X-12-157] [PMID] [PMCID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2021 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Annals of Applied Sport Science

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb