year 11, Issue 1 (Spring 2023)                   Ann Appl Sport Sci 2023, 11(1): 0-0 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


1- Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand
2- Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand , nugrob.raw@mahidol.ac.th
Abstract:   (1679 Views)
Background. Today, the trend of maintaining good health and exercise has become very popular in Thailand, but from the document studied by the researcher, many sports facilities were abandoned. Some were not ready to use, and others were damaged.
Objectives. This research aimed to study the actual conditions and expected conditions of people who used the field services, the equipment, and the sports facilities in Thailand's sports field and facilities management under the supervision of local administrative organizations and create their management model.
Methods. This study utilized mixed-method research. The quantitative phase was characterized by an initial quantitative step of data collection through the questionnaire with 420 participants by selecting through the Multi-Stage sampling method and analyzed with the descriptive statistic and a T-test. In the qualitative phase with the focus group interview research method, 11 experts in sports facilities used purposive sampling with semi-structured interviews.
Results. The quantitative process identified the seven components of the management model of field equipment and sports facilities in Thailand consisted of 1) Property; 2) Service; 3) Technology; 3) Security; 4) Maintenance; 5) Support; system; and 6) Sustainable Management, and the result found a significant relationship between the actual conditions and expected conditions towards the seven components (P < 0.05). The qualitative part confirmed the quantitative findings.
Conclusion. The considerable gap difference between the actual and the expectation of the customers created the awareness of the policymakers to change something in a good way for developing all dimensions in the sports facility in Thailand. Nevertheless, the result of this research with the POLC principle could be helpful for the benefit of those policymakers in the field.
Full-Text [PDF 323 kb]   (1599 Downloads)    
 
 
APPLICABLE REMARKS
• The organization should use sports activities to stimulate the public's attention by organizing sports activities with supporting standards, and use technology to help public relations in various fields to make people in the area know and pay more attention to using the stadium service.
• Agencies should establish a system for collecting user information on sports facilities, and generate a QR code to educate the people on sports fields and how to exercise and correctly play sports. This will help them to better access sports fields depending on the local context.
• Agencies should increase the green space in the sports fields as they should be useful not only to do exercise but bring the family to relax or do activities together for sustainability and continuality.
• The administrators of the local government organization should support and encourage personnel responsible for sports to have opportunities for training, and study visits on the management of private sports fields.
• The administrators of the local government organization should collaborate with Sports associations to organize sports activities in local sports fields.
• The administrators of the local government organization should establish a sports fields management committee by inviting all sectors which are stakeholders to be committed.
• Personnel should be cultivated in values and awareness of participation in the sports fields ownership.

Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Sport Management and its related branches
Received: 2022/02/7 | Accepted: 2022/04/27

References
1. The Ministry of Tourism and Sports Thailand. The Sixth National Sports Development Plan (2017 - 2021). 2022. Available from: https://www.rolandberger.com/publications/publication_pdf/roland_berger_the_sixth_national_sports_development_plan_2017_2021.pdf.
2. Grigoryeva VV, Andreev NV, Pozdnyakov KK. Features and priorities of mass sports infrastructure development. . 2021;3:225-230. [DOI:10.17513/vaael.1911]
3. Amornsriwatanakul A, Lester L, Bull FC, Rosenberg M. Ecological correlates of sport and exercise participation among Thai adolescents: A hierarchical examination of a cross-sectional population survey. J Sport Health Sci. 2020. [DOI:10.1016/j.jshs.2020.04.012] [PMID]
4. Khaosod Online. Retrieved January 30 2022. Available from: https://www.khaosod.co.th/around-thailand/news_5855118.
5. Kaewkajang P, Pluksacheewa T. Fitness Management System. Unpublished manuscript, Siam University, Bangkok, Thailand.2019.
6. Sasuad K, Nuntasen P. Sport Event Management Model of Thai Football Clubs for Promoting Tourism. NRRU Communit Res J. 2018;13(1):54-67.
7. Department of Physical Education. The document of the sport stadium construction in the district level of Department of Physical Education. Retrieved January 30 2022. Available from: https://amnatcharoen.mots.go.th/download/article/article_20180302102034.pdf.
8. Department of Physical Education. The report of the assessment of the exercise in Thai population in 2020. Retrieved January 30. 2022.
9. Kwon YS, Lee BK, Sohn SY. Optimal location-allocation model for the installation of rooftop sports facilities in metropolitan areas. Eur Sport Manag Q. 2019;20(2):189-204. [DOI:10.1080/16184742.2019.1598454]
10. Cieślikowski K, Brusok A. Determinants of effective management in the sport with the use of large sport arenas in selected cities. Eur J Serv Manag. 2017;21(1). [DOI:10.18276/ejsm.2017.21-01]
11. Amaral CMDS, Mazzei LC, Bastos FDC. Managerial behavior of sports facilities managers: an approach with public and non-profit organizations in São Paulo. Mot Rev de Educ Fis. 2021;27. [DOI:10.1590/s1980-657420210020320]
12. Mamashli J, Doosti M, Tabesh S, Farzan F, Abdavi F. Provision of an Integrated Health, Safety, and Environment Management Model in Sports Facilities in Iran. Arch Hyg Sci. 2019;8(4):286-298. [DOI:10.29252/ArchHygSci.8.4.286]
13. Song HJ, Dennis S, Levesque JF, Harris MF. What do consumers with chronic conditions expect from their interactions with general practitioners? A qualitative study of Australian consumer and provider perspectives. Health Expect. 2020;23(3):707-716. [DOI:10.1111/hex.13050] [PMID] [PMCID]
14. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP. Recommendations for Creating Better Concept Definitions in the Organizational, Behavioral, and Social Sciences. Organ Res Method. 2016;19(2):159-203. [DOI:10.1177/1094428115624965]
15. Gordon N. Partnership between private and public sectors in service delivery. WMO Bullet. 2008;57(4):233-236.
16. Jiménez Díaz-Benito V, Barriopedro M, Frédéric V. Physical activity and health promotion programmes in workplace: a meta-analysis of effectiveness in European organizations. J Workplace Behav Health. 2020;35. [DOI:10.1080/15555240.2020.1720515]
17. Kardakis T, Jerden L, Nystrom ME, Weinehall L, Johansson H. Implementation of clinical practice guidelines on lifestyle interventions in Swedish primary healthcare - a two-year follow up. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):227. [DOI:10.1186/s12913-018-3023-z] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Turhani A. Service - Fee Mechanism in the PPP Projects. Eur Sci J, ESJ. 2013;9(19).
19. Manev G, Jakimovski J. Role of knowledge management in sport organizations. Skola biznisa. 2017:150-171. [DOI:10.5937/skolbiz2-16091]
20. Hyland-Wood B, Gardner J, Leask J, Ecker UKH. Toward effective government communication strategies in the era of COVID-19. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2021;8(30). [DOI:10.1057/s41599-020-00701-w]
21. Alhadad S, Abood O. Enhancing Smart Sport Management based on Information Technology. Int Organiz. 2018;5:19-26.
22. Dobbinson SJ, Hayman JA, Livingston PM. Prevalence of health promotion policies in sports clubs in Victoria, Australia. Health Promot Int. 2006;21(2):121-129. [DOI:10.1093/heapro/dak001] [PMID]
23. Swan P, Otago L, Finch CF, Payne WR. The policies and practices of sports governing bodies in relation to assessing the safety of sports grounds. J Sci Med Sport. 2009;12(1):171-176. [DOI:10.1016/j.jsams.2007.12.004] [PMID]
24. Mwanza B, Mbohwa C. Safety in Maintenance: An Improvement Framework. Procedia Manuf. 2017;8:657-664. [DOI:10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.084]
25. Shuma C, Ijigu A. Practice and Challenges of Sport Facility Management in Nekemte Town, Advances. 2020;3(1):11-15.
26. Aggerholm K, Breivik G. Being, having and belonging: values and ways of engaging in sport, Sport in Society. 2021;24(7):1141-1155. [DOI:10.1080/17430437.2020.1734562]
27. Hong HJ. eSports: the need for a structured support system for players. Europe Sport Manage Quarter. 2020.
28. Manresa A, Escobar RD. Excellence in Sustainable Management in a Changing Environment. Sustainabil. 2021;13(4):2296. [DOI:10.3390/su13042296]
29. Graham J, Trendafilova S, Ziakas V. Environmental sustainability and sport management education: bridging the gaps. Manag Sport Leisure. 2018;23(4-6):422-433. [DOI:10.1080/23750472.2018.1530069]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.