Volume 8 - Autumn Supplementary                   Ann Appl Sport Sci 2020, 8 - Autumn Supplementary: 0-0 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Bakhtiary F, Noorbakhsh M, Noorbakhsh P, Sepasi H. Development and Validation of a Tool for Assessing Barriers to Participation in Team Sports for Women with Physical-Mobility Disabilities. Ann Appl Sport Sci 2020; 8 (S1)
URL: http://aassjournal.com/article-1-809-en.html
1- Department of Sport Management, Faculty of Sports Science, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
2- Department of Sport Management, Faculty of Sports Science, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran , mahvashnoorbakhsh@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (5368 Views)
Background. Creating proper contexts to maximize sport participation of women with physical-mobility disabilities requires identifying barriers to their participation. It is essential to develop a valid and reliable tool to identify existing barriers.
Objectives. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a questionnaire for assessing barriers to participation in team sports for women with physical-mobility disabilities.
Methods. The data were collected through theoretical literature, observation and semi-structured interviews with experts and professors of disability sports and women with physical-mobility disabilities selected through purposeful and snowball sampling methods. The main barriers were identified and the questionnaire was then prepared. To carry out statistical analysis on reliability and validity of the tool using factor analysis, the above questionnaire was distributed among 300 statistical samples selected by proportional stratified sampling across the country.
Results. Results of factor analysis showed that it was logical to maintain 10 factors that explained 65.5% of the total variance. All items had a positive contribution to overall reliability.
Conclusions. The final questionnaire (10 factors and 48 questions) was developed that could be a reliable tool for future researches, the results of which can be used by disability sport administrators to adopt policies to ensure active sport participation of women with physical mobility disabilities.
Full-Text [PDF 442 kb]   (1598 Downloads)    


  • It seems that the authorities and administrators of the disabled people play the greatest role in the building culture and creating appropriate contexts for the growth and active sport participation of women with disabilities.
  • By focusing on these barriers, the provincial sport committees can adopt programs that enable greater participation of women.
  • Disability sport managers should adopt strategic policies to address the barriers.
  • The Ministry of Sports and Youth can facilitate the barriers associated with a number of these factors by allocating sufficient funds and injecting them into provincial sport committees.

Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Sport Management and its related branches
Received: 2019/10/10 | Accepted: 2019/12/28

1. Wilson NC, Khoo S. Benefits and barriers to sport participation for athletes with disabilities: The case of Malaysia. J Disabilit Soci. 2013;28(8):1132-45. [DOI:10.1080/09687599.2012.758034]
2. Diaz R, Miller EK, Kraus E, Fredericson M. Impact of adaptive sports participation on quality of life. Sports medicine and arthroscopy review. 2019;27(2):73-82. [DOI:10.1097/JSA.0000000000000242] [PMID]
3. Lundberg N, Bennett J, Smith S. Outcomes of adaptive sport and recreation participation among veterans returning from combat with acquired disability. Therapeutic Recreat J. 2011;45(2):105-12.
4. Jeong M, Kim SY, Lee E. Parents' beliefs and intentions toward supporting physical activity participation for their children with disabilities. Adapted physical activity quarterly : APAQ. 2015;32(2):93-105. [DOI:10.1123/APAQ.2013-0106] [PMID]
5. De Vries NM, Van Ravensberg CD, Hobbelen JS, Olde Rikkert MG, Staal JB, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW. Effects of physical exercise therapy on mobility, physical functioning, physical activity and quality of life in community-dwelling older adults with impaired mobility, physical disability and/or multi-morbidity: a meta-analysis. Ageing research reviews. 2012;11(1):136-49. [DOI:10.1016/j.arr.2011.11.002] [PMID]
6. Bakhtiary F, Noorbakhsh M, Khodayari A. The relationship between participation physical activities and mental health and quality of life of veterans and disabled athletes of table tennis. Int J Rev Life Sci. 2015;5(3):744-50.
7. Devine MA. Leisure-time physical activity: Experiences of college students with disabilities. Adapted physical activity quarterly : APAQ. 2016;33(2):176-94. [DOI:10.1123/APAQ.2014-0241] [PMID]
8. Harris MA. The relationship between physical inactivity and mental wellbeing: Findings from a gamification-based community-wide physical activity intervention. Health psychology open. 2018;5(1):2055102917753853. [DOI:10.1177/2055102917753853] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Townsend J, Hawkins B, Bennett JL, Hoffman J. Preliminary long-time Health outcomes associated with recreation-based health 7 wellness programs for injured service. Cogent Psychol. 2018;5(1). [DOI:10.1080/23311908.2018.1444330]
10. Caddick N, Smith B. The impact of sport and physical activity on the well-being of combat veterans: A systematic review. Psychol Sport Exercise. 2014;15(1):9-18. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.09.011]
11. Allender S, Cowburn G, Foster C. Understanding participation in sport and physical activity among children and adults: a review of qualitative studies. Health education research. 2006;21(6):826-35. [DOI:10.1093/her/cyl063] [PMID]
12. Bragaru M, van Wilgen CP, Geertzen JH, Ruijs SG, Dijkstra PU, Dekker R. Barriers and facilitators of participation in sports: a qualitative study on Dutch individuals with lower limb amputation. PloS one. 2013;8(3):e59881. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0059881] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Perrier MJ, Shirazipour CH, Latimer-Cheung AE. Sport participation among individuals with acquired physical disabilities: group differences on demographic, disability, and Health Action Process Approach constructs. Disability and health journal. 2015;8(2):216-22. [DOI:10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.09.009] [PMID]
14. Jaarsma E. Sport participation and physical Disabilities.2014.
15. Moradi F, Poursoltani Zarandi H, Ghasemi H. (The barriers recognizing for participating of disabled in sport in Alborz province [dissertation]. . Payame Noor Univ Karaj Center Department Educat Psychol. 2015.
16. Goshtasbi A, Zarghami M, Mehdipour A. Identification and Prioritization of Factors in Preventing and Eliminating the Participation of Physical-Mental Disabilities in Shiraz City in Physical Activity[dissertation]. Facult Physic Educat Sport Sci Chamran Martyr Ahwaz Univ. 2012.
17. Sobhani A, Andam R, Zarifi M. Study and prioritizing the factors and barriers to sport participation of disabled people of Ahvaz city. Organiz Behav Manage Sport Stud. 2015;2(6):41-8.
18. Pour Ranjbar M, Keshavars L, Sharifian A, Farahani A. Barriers to participation in wheelchairs disabled people's physical-recreational activities in Kerman province. J Health Develop. 2014;3(2):157-88.
19. Yamoosa A. Study of cultural, social and sports barriers of the disabled and their lack of participation in motor activity [dissertation]. Islamic Azad Univ Shoushtar Branch. 2011.
20. Dehqandar F. Comparison of barriers to physical activity, movement of male veterans with spinal cord injury and amputation (lower extremity) [dissertation]. Physic Educat Sport Scie Shiraz Univ. 2011.
21. Taghian Z, Azadfada S, Pour Sultani Zarandi H. Analytical Study on the Barriers to the Participation of Veteran Women in Sport Activities Based on Crawford's Hierarchical Model. Iran J Isaar Stud. 2017;1(3):127-32.
22. Rankin MA. Understanding the barriers of participation in sport2012.
23. Gall MD, Borg RW, Gall PG. Quantitative and qualitative research methods in educational science and psychology. Translated by Ahmad Reza Nasr, et al. 1398. 11 ed: Samt Publication; 2010.
24. MacCallum RC, Austin JT. Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual review of psychology. 2000;51:201-26. [DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.201] [PMID]
25. Delkhosh H. Comparison of treston, Likert and Gutman scaling method. Master thesis. Allameh Tabataba'i University1996.
26. Davis D. Business research for decision marketing. 6 ed. Belmont, California: Thomson, Brooks, Cole; 2005.
27. Ghorbani H, Mehdizade A, Rezaee M, Maddahi A. Investigating the preventive factors of participation of veterans and disabled in sport activities in Uromia. Nation Conference New Academ Achiev Physic Educat Sport Sci. 2013.
28. Imanian M, Heidarinezhad S, Khatibi A, editors. Analysis of the content of sports television programs with the sport-disabled approach. The 3rd national conference on sport sciences and physical education of Iran; 2017.
29. Ehsani M, Koozechian H, Keshkar S. Investigating and analyzing the deterrent factors and participation rate of women in Tehran in recreational sports activities. Res Sport Sci. 2007;17:63-88.
30. Shirvani T, Kiyani M, Ansari Ardali Z, Ansari Ardali R. Investigating the relationship between socioeconomic status and the motivation of participation in sports activities among veterans and disabled in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province. New Approach Sport Manage. 2015;2(7):75-85.
31. Naghdi A, Balali A, Imani P. Social-cultural barriers to women's participation in sports activities. Develop Politic (Women Res). 2011;9(1):147-63.

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2023 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Annals of Applied Sport Science

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb