Volume 12 - Spring Supplementary
Ann Appl Sport Sci 2024, 12 - Spring Supplementary: 0-0 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Chang M, Abdul Malik A, Hashim H A. Perceptual Responses and Health Parameters of 12 Weeks of Moderate- and High-Intensity Interval Exercise Intervention in Physically Inactive College Students. Ann Appl Sport Sci 2024; 12
URL: http://aassjournal.com/article-1-1292-en.html
URL: http://aassjournal.com/article-1-1292-en.html
1- Exercise and Sports Science Programme, School of Health Sciences, University Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
2- Exercise and Sports Science Programme, School of Health Sciences, University Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia. ,adamalik@usm.my
2- Exercise and Sports Science Programme, School of Health Sciences, University Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia. ,
Abstract: (1240 Views)
Background. Both affective and enjoyment responses to continuous-type exercise are regulated by the exercise intensity, but the changes in these responses during interval-type exercise with different intensity is unclear.
Objectives. The present study examined the effect of different work intensities on the perceptual and health parameters during interval exercise.
Methods. Twenty-four inactive college students (aged 20.8±1.2 years; PA levels=448±80 MET-min/week) were randomized to 12 weeks of HIIE (n=12; 6-10×1-min work-intervals at 90% of MAS) or MIIE (n=12; 6-10×1-min work-intervals at 60% of MAS), both for three days in a week (36 sessions). Perceptual responses (affective, enjoyment, and perceived exertion) observed in sessions 1, 18, and 36 were analyzed. Whereas health parameters (cardiorespiratory fitness and body composition) were measured before and after 12-week exercise intervention.
Results. HIIE generated lower affective responses at work interval 4 and end work interval in session 1 and session 18 (all P<0.04, all ES>1.70). However, HIIE elicited greater FS at the end of the work interval during sessions 18 and 36 compared to session 1 (P<0.04, ES>1.55). Both groups generated greater post-enjoyment in session 36 compared to session 1 (all P<0.02, all ES>0.60). HIIE produced greater improvement in cardiorespiratory responses and body composition than MIIE following a 12-week intervention (P<0.04, all ES>60).
Conclusion. HIIE appears to be a time-efficient and viable strategy to facilitate future exercise adherence while producing health benefits among physically inactive college students when considering the impact of perceptual responses and health parameters.
Objectives. The present study examined the effect of different work intensities on the perceptual and health parameters during interval exercise.
Methods. Twenty-four inactive college students (aged 20.8±1.2 years; PA levels=448±80 MET-min/week) were randomized to 12 weeks of HIIE (n=12; 6-10×1-min work-intervals at 90% of MAS) or MIIE (n=12; 6-10×1-min work-intervals at 60% of MAS), both for three days in a week (36 sessions). Perceptual responses (affective, enjoyment, and perceived exertion) observed in sessions 1, 18, and 36 were analyzed. Whereas health parameters (cardiorespiratory fitness and body composition) were measured before and after 12-week exercise intervention.
Results. HIIE generated lower affective responses at work interval 4 and end work interval in session 1 and session 18 (all P<0.04, all ES>1.70). However, HIIE elicited greater FS at the end of the work interval during sessions 18 and 36 compared to session 1 (P<0.04, ES>1.55). Both groups generated greater post-enjoyment in session 36 compared to session 1 (all P<0.02, all ES>0.60). HIIE produced greater improvement in cardiorespiratory responses and body composition than MIIE following a 12-week intervention (P<0.04, all ES>60).
Conclusion. HIIE appears to be a time-efficient and viable strategy to facilitate future exercise adherence while producing health benefits among physically inactive college students when considering the impact of perceptual responses and health parameters.
Keywords: Interval Exercise, Affective Responses, Inactive Adults, Body Composition, Cardiorespiratory Responses.
Full-Text [PDF 901 kb]
(684 Downloads)
APPLICABLE REMARKS
APPLICABLE REMARKS
- HIIE elicited lower affective responses during the initial week but both groups produced comparable affective responses after a few weeks of interventions.
- Similar enjoyment responses were evident following HIIE and MIIE.
- HIIE generated greater improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness and body composition compared to MIIE.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Sport Physiology and its related branches
Received: 2023/10/6 | Accepted: 2023/12/14
Received: 2023/10/6 | Accepted: 2023/12/14
References
1. 1. Anuar A, Hussin NZMH, Maon SN, Hassan NM, Abdullah MZ, Mohd IH, & Sahudin Z. Physical inactivity among university students, Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci. 2021;11(5), 356-366. [DOI:10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i5/9934]
2. Garber CE. The health benefits of exercise in overweight and obese patients. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2019; 18(8), 287-291. [DOI:10.1249/JSR.0000000000000619] [PMID]
3. Li F, Kong Z, Zhu X, Chow BC, Zhang D, Liang W, Shang B, Liu Y, & Zhang H. High-intensity interval training elicits more enjoyable and positive affective valence than moderate-intensity training over a 12-week intervention in overweight young women, J Exerc Sci Fit. 2022;20(3), 249-55. [DOI:10.1016/j.jesf.2022.05.001] [PMID] []
4. Engel FA, Rappelt L, Held S, Donath L. Can high-intensity functional suspension training over eight weeks, improve resting blood pressure and quality of life in young adults? A randomized controlled trial, Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019:16(24), 5062. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph16245062] [PMID] []
5. Alonso-Fernández D, Fernández-Rodríguez R, Taboada-Iglesias Y, Gutiérrez-Sánchez Á. Impact of high-intensity interval training on body composition and depressive symptoms in adults under home confinement. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(10), 6145. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph19106145] [PMID] []
6. Ekkekakis P. Pleasure and displeasure from the body: Perspectives from exercise. Cog Emot. 2003;17(2), 213-239. [DOI:10.1080/02699930302292] [PMID]
7. Metcalfe RS, Williams S, Fernandes GS, Astorino TA, Stork MJ, Phillips SM, Niven A, & Vollaard NBJ. Affecting effects on effect: the impact of protocol permutations on affective responses to sprint interval exercise; a systematic review and meta-analysis of pooled individual participant data. Front Sports Act Living. 2022;17(4), 815555. [DOI:10.3389/fspor.2022.815555] [PMID] []
8. Jiménez-Pavón D, Lavie CJ. High-intensity intermittent training versus moderate-intensity intermittent training: is it a matter of intensity or intermittent efforts? BJSM. 2017; 51(18), 1319-20. [DOI:10.1136/bjsports-2016-097015] [PMID]
9. Malik AA, Williams CA, Weston KL, Barker AR. Perceptual responses to high- and moderate-intensity interval exercise in adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50(5), 1021-30. [DOI:10.1249/MSS.0000000000001508] [PMID]
10. Schneider ML, Graham DJ. Personality, physical fitness, and affective response to exercise among adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exer. 2009; 41(4):947-55. [DOI:10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818de009] [PMID] []
11. Macfarlane DJ, Lee CCY, Ho EYK, Chan KL, Chan DTS. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of IPAQ (short, last 7 days). J Sci Med Sport. 2007; 10(1), 45-51. [DOI:10.1016/j.jsams.2006.05.003] [PMID]
12. Gerbeaux M, Lensel-Corbeil G, Branly G, Dierkens JM, Jacquet A, Lefranc JF, Savin A, & Savin N. Estimation of the maximum aerobic velocity for pupils in secondary and high schools. Mov Sports Sci. 1991;13, 19-26.
13. Stickland MK, Petersen SR, Bouffard M. Prediction of maximal aerobic power from the 20-m multi-stage shuttle run test. Can J Appl Physiol. 2003; 28(2), 272-82. [DOI:10.1139/h03-021] [PMID]
14. Hardy CJ, Rejeski WJ. Not what, but how one feels: the measurement of affect during exercise. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 1989; 11(3), 304-17. [DOI:10.1123/jsep.11.3.304]
15. Borg G. Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales. Med Sci Sports Exer. 1998;30(9), 1461. [DOI:10.1249/00005768-199809000-00018]
16. Chen H, Dai J, Sun H. Validation of a Chinese version of the physical activity enjoyment scale: Factorial validity, measurement equivalence, and predictive validity, Int J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2019; 17:4, 367-380. [DOI:10.1080/1612197X.2017.1354054]
17. Thum JS, Parsons G, Whittle T, Astorino TA. High-intensity interval training elicits higher enjoyment than moderate intensity continuous exercise, PLOS one. 2017; 12(1), e0166299. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0166299] [PMID] []
18. Ekkekakis P, Hall EE, Petruzzello SJ. The relationship between exercise intensity and affective responses demystified: to crack the 40-year-old nut, replace the 40-year-old nutcracker! Ann Behav Med. 2008; 35(2), 136-49. [DOI:10.1007/s12160-008-9025-z] [PMID]
19. Kilpatrick M, Kraemer R, Bartholomew J, Acevedo E, Jarreau D. Affective responses to exercise are dependent on intensity rather than total work, Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007; 39(8), 1417-22. [DOI:10.1249/mss.0b013e31806ad73c] [PMID]
20. Lee HH, Emerson JA, Williams DM. The exercise-affect-adherence pathway: An evolutionary perspective. Front Psychol. 2016;7, 1285. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01285]
21. Ayob AL, Malik AA, Hashim HA, Muhamad AS. The effects of prescribed and self-paced high-intensity interval exercise on affective and enjoyment responses in adults with overweight-to-obesity. Ann Appl Sport Sci. 2023; 11(2):0-0. [DOI:10.52547/aassjournal.1146]
22. Rhodes RE, Kates A. Can the affective response to exercise predict future motives and physical activity behavior? A systematic review of published evidence. Ann Behav Med. 2015; 49(5):715-31. [DOI:10.1007/s12160-015-9704-5] [PMID]
23. Frazão DT, de Farias Junior LF, Dantas TCB, Krinski K, Elsangedy HM, Prestes J, Hardcastle SJ, & Costa EC. Feeling of pleasure to high-intensity interval exercise is dependent of the number of work bouts and physical activity status. PloS One. 2016; 11(3), e0152752. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0152752] [PMID] []
24. Oliveira BRR, Santos TM, Kilpatrick M, Pires FO, Deslandes AC. Affective and enjoyment responses in high intensity interval training and continuous training: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS One. 2018 13(6):e0197124. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0197124] [PMID] []
25. Sultana RN, Sabag A, Keating SE, Johnson NA. The effect of low-volume high-intensity interval training on body composition and cardiorespiratory fitness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2019; 49(11), 1687-721. [DOI:10.1007/s40279-019-01167-w] [PMID]
26. Millet GP, Vleck VE, Bentley DJ. Physiological differences between cycling and running: lessons from triathletes. Sports Med. 2009; 39(3), 179-206. [DOI:10.2165/00007256-200939030-00002] [PMID]
27. Daley AJ, & Maynard I. Affect and choice of exercise mode during and after acute exercise. J Sports Sci. 2003; 21(4), 267-8. [DOI:10.1016/S1469-0292(02)00018-3]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
