year 7, Issue 3 (Autumn 2019)
Ann Appl Sport Sci 2019, 7(3): 57-63 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Al-Mashhadi R A A. Effectiveness of SWOT and Kaizen in the Dominance of the Brain and the Hypocritical Personality of Physical Education Students. Ann Appl Sport Sci 2019; 7 (3) :57-63
URL: http://aassjournal.com/article-1-768-en.html
URL: http://aassjournal.com/article-1-768-en.html
Responsible Sports Activities, Faculty of Materials Engineering, University of Babylon, Babylon, Iraq , dr_raeed@yahoo.com
Abstract: (4152 Views)
Background. Teachers including university professors insist on keeping up to date with the updating of students' information and developing their scientific potentials, through use of diverse teaching strategies.
Objectives. Identifying on the brain dominance and the hypocritical personality for students, knowledge effect SWOT and Kaizen strategy in the brain dominance and the hypocritical personality for student and knowledge the strategies which achieve more development in the brain dominance and reduce the hypocritical personality for students.
Methods. Two methods were used the descriptive method in measurement of the brain dominance and hypocritical personality, and the experimental method to determine the effectiveness of using the SWOT and Kaizen strategies in developing the brain dominance and reduce the hypocritical personality with fourth stage students in Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, sample of the research 60 students and duration of the procedures 14 weeks.
Results. The SWOT and Kaizen are of the important strategies. Teachers should use it with their students to learn and develop brain dominance and reduction hypocritical personality for students.
Conclusion. Brain dominance and hypocritical personality is centered within the moderate normative level of the students, SWOT and Kaizen strategies play a small role in development of the brain dominance and effective in reducing the hypocritical personality for students, there is no difference between the Kaizen and SWOT strategies in developing the brain dominance and a SWOT strategy is better than Kaizen's strategy for reducing students' hypocritical personality.
Objectives. Identifying on the brain dominance and the hypocritical personality for students, knowledge effect SWOT and Kaizen strategy in the brain dominance and the hypocritical personality for student and knowledge the strategies which achieve more development in the brain dominance and reduce the hypocritical personality for students.
Methods. Two methods were used the descriptive method in measurement of the brain dominance and hypocritical personality, and the experimental method to determine the effectiveness of using the SWOT and Kaizen strategies in developing the brain dominance and reduce the hypocritical personality with fourth stage students in Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, sample of the research 60 students and duration of the procedures 14 weeks.
Results. The SWOT and Kaizen are of the important strategies. Teachers should use it with their students to learn and develop brain dominance and reduction hypocritical personality for students.
Conclusion. Brain dominance and hypocritical personality is centered within the moderate normative level of the students, SWOT and Kaizen strategies play a small role in development of the brain dominance and effective in reducing the hypocritical personality for students, there is no difference between the Kaizen and SWOT strategies in developing the brain dominance and a SWOT strategy is better than Kaizen's strategy for reducing students' hypocritical personality.
Full-Text [PDF 606 kb]
(1255 Downloads)
APPLICABLE REMARKS
• A dopting teacher on the Kaizen and SWOT strategies as modern strategies in teaching for the various materials and sports skills for their important role in the educational process.
• On teachers seek to address the problems of the hypocritical personality and development the brain dominance for their students.
• Confirmation the teachers on the two strategies to reduce the student's hypocritical personality.
APPLICABLE REMARKS
• A dopting teacher on the Kaizen and SWOT strategies as modern strategies in teaching for the various materials and sports skills for their important role in the educational process.
• On teachers seek to address the problems of the hypocritical personality and development the brain dominance for their students.
• Confirmation the teachers on the two strategies to reduce the student's hypocritical personality.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Physical Education Learning
Received: 2019/03/14 | Accepted: 2019/05/29
Received: 2019/03/14 | Accepted: 2019/05/29
References
1. Reimers AK, Wagner M, Alvanides S, Steinmayr A, Reiner M, Schmidt S, et al. Proximity to sports facilities and sports participation for adolescents in Germany. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e93059. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0093059] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Hirnstein M, Hugdahl K, Hausmann M. Cognitive sex differences and hemispheric asymmetry: A critical review of 40 years of research. Laterality. 2019;24(2):204-252. [DOI:10.1080/1357650X.2018.1497044] [PMID]
3. Bailey R. Sport, physical activity and educational achievement - towards an explanatory model. Sport Soc. 2016;20(7):768-788. [DOI:10.1080/17430437.2016.1207756]
4. Özgen K, Tataroğlu B, Alkan H. An examination of brain dominance and learning styles of pre-service mathematics teachers. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 2011;15:743-750 [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.176]
5. Herrmann Global L. Exploring your mind: brain dominance according to the herrmann: Herrmann Global, LLC; 2018 [cited 2019]. Available from: https://exploringyourmind.com/br-herrmann-quadrants.
6. AlGhraibeh AMA. Learning and Thinking Styles Based on Whole Brain Theory in Relation to Emotional Intelligence. OALib. 2015;02(05):1-14. [DOI:10.4236/oalib.1101436]
7. Hughes M, Hughes P, Hodgkinson IR. In pursuit of a 'whole-brain' approach to undergraduate teaching: implications of the Herrmann brain dominance model. Stud High Educ. 2016;42(12):2389-2405. [DOI:10.1080/03075079.2016.1152463]
8. Yankah EN. Legal Hypocrisy. Ratio Juris. 2019;32(1):2-20. [DOI:10.1111/raju.12234]
9. Isserow J, Klein C. Hypocrisy and Moral Authority. J Ethics Soc Philos. 2017;12(2):191-222. [DOI:10.26556/jesp.v12i2.224]
10. Afthanorhan A, Nazim A. Introduction To SPSS2015.
11. Zailani S, Shaharudin MR, Saw B. Impact of kaizen on firm's competitive advantage in a Japanese owned company in Malaysia. Int J Prod Qual Manage. 2015;16(2):183. [DOI:10.1504/IJPQM.2015.071239]
12. Kadar M, Popescu T, Moise IA, Muntean M. BLIS-brain Lateralisation Information System for Personalised Education Programmes Offered to Students of Engineering. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 2013;93:1065-1069. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.331]
13. GÜRel E. Swot Analysis: A Theoretical Review. J Int Soc Res. 2017;10(51):994-1006. [DOI:10.17719/jisr.2017.1832]
14. Gordian B. KAIZEN as a Strategy for Improving SMEs' Performance: Assessing its Acceptability and Feasibility in Tanzania. 2014.
15. Herrmann Global L. LLC: What is whole brain® thinking? : Herrmann Global, LLC; 2015 [cited 2019]. Available from: https://www.herrmann.com.au/what-is-whole-brain-thinking.
16. Schmitz J, Gunturkun O, Ocklenburg S. Building an Asymmetrical Brain: The Molecular Perspective. Front Psychol. 2019;10:9828 [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00982] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Aarhan L. A Strategic Planning of Developing Student Information Management System Using SWOT Technique. J Univ Hum Dev. 2016;2(3):515-519. [DOI:10.21928/juhd.20160203.28]
18. Phadermrod B, Crowder RM, Wills GB. Importance-performance analysis based SWOT analysis. Int J Inf Manage. 2019;44:194-203. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.03.009]
19. Ghazinoory S, Abdi M, Azadegan-Mehr M. Swot Methodology: A State-of-the-Art Review for the Past, a Framework for the Future / Ssgg Metodologija: Praeities Ir Ateities AnalizĖ. J Busin Econ Manage. 2011;12(1):24-48. [DOI:10.3846/16111699.2011.555358]
20. O'Regan L, Serrien DJ. Individual Differences and Hemispheric Asymmetries for Language and Spatial Attention. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018;12:380. [DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00380] [PMID] [PMCID]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
