year 10, Issue 3 (Autumn 2022)                   Ann Appl Sport Sci 2022, 10(3): 0-0 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Alfonso Mora M L, Rey Rojas C, Herrera Yallonardo L M. Comparison of Plantar Dynamics During Four Sports Gestures in Rugby Players. Ann Appl Sport Sci 2022; 10 (3)
URL: http://aassjournal.com/article-1-1026-en.html
1- Institutional Filiation as Follows: Universidad de La Sabana Campus puente del común Chía, Colombia , margarethalmo@unisabana.edu.co
2- Institutional Filiation as Follows: Universidad de La Sabana Campus puente del común Chía, Colombia
Abstract:   (2136 Views)
Background. Four of the most relevant gestures in rugby (RU) are the pass, the tackle, the line out, and the scrum. RU is the third most common contact sport on the planet, and being a fast-paced collision game and carries a high risk of injury.
Objectives. To describe and compare plantar dynamics during four sports gestures in rugby players through speed, strength, and balance.
Methods. Twenty-five male RU players were included who repeated four gestures three times using Moticon’s OpenGo sensor templates to assess seeding dynamics throughout the gestures. The data was stored in Microsoft Excel. An average of three gestures was calculated and used for statistical exploration using Wilcoxon and Friedman.
Results. The four gestures’ highest mean total force (MTF) was on the left foot. On the right foot, the center of pressure (COP) tended to travel faster, and the COP stroke length was primarily larger on this foot. The line-out has generally been the gesture in which the foot had the greatest MTF, and the tackle and scrum were the gestures in which the COP moved the fastest and with the longest stroke length.
Conclusion. The line out, in general, was the gesture in which the foot had the highest MTF. This pressure was predominantly concentrated in the posterior and medial parts of the left foot, and the tackle and the pass were the gestures in which the COP traveled with more velocity and with a longer trace length, especially in the right foot.
Full-Text [PDF 293 kb]   (854 Downloads)    
 
 
APPLICABLE REMARKS
• The results of this research impact the sporting gesture considerations of rugby players and the prevention of rugby-related injuries.

Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Sport Biomechanics and its related branches
Received: 2021/06/1 | Accepted: 2021/07/15

References
1. Gardner AJ, Iverson GL, Williams WH, Baker S, Stanwell P. A systematic review and meta-analysis of concussion in Rugby :union:. Sport Med. 2014;44(12):1717-1731. [DOI:10.1007/s40279-014-0233-3] [PMID]
2. Archbold HAP, Rankin AT, Webb M. Physical Therapy in Sport Recurrent injury patterns in adolescent rugby. Phys Ther Sport. 2018;33:12-17. [DOI:10.1016/j.ptsp.2018.06.005] [PMID]
3. Fuller CW. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport Modelling injury-burden in rugby sevens. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(6):553-557. [DOI:10.1016/j.jsams.2017.10.019] [PMID]
4. Tee JC, Bekker S, Collins R. The efficacy of an iterative "sequence of prevention" approach to injury prevention by a multidisciplinary team in professional rugby :union:. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(9):899-904. [DOI:10.1016/j.jsams.2018.02.003] [PMID]
5. Yeomans C, Kenny IC, Cahalan R. The Incidence of Injury in Amateur Male Rugby :union:: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sport Med. 2018;48(4):837-848. [DOI:10.1007/s40279-017-0838-4] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Delfino Barboza S, Rössler R, Verhagen E. Considerations and Interpretation of Sports Injury Prevention Studies. Clin Sports Med. 2018;37(3):413-425. [DOI:10.1016/j.csm.2018.03.006] [PMID]
7. Kaux JF, Julia M, Delvaux F. Epidemiological Review of Injuries in Rugby :union:. Sport. 2015;3(1):21-29. [DOI:10.3390/sports3010021]
8. Stöggl T, Martiner A. Validation of Moticon's OpenGo sensor insoles during gait, jumps, balance and cross-country skiing specific imitation movements. J Sports Sci. 2017;35(2):196-206. [DOI:10.1080/02640414.2016.1161205] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Price FT. Validation of A Wearable Sensor Insole Device For Analysis Of Postural Control.2018.
10. Comparison NF. Foot Symmetry and Plantar Pressure Characteristics in Elite Taekwondo Foot Symmetry and Plantar Pressure Characteristics in Elite Taekwondo Athletes ; Preferred and Non-Preferred Foot Comparison.2016.
11. Wafai L, Zayegh A, Woulfe J, Aziz SM, Begg R. Identification of Foot Pathologies Based on Plantar Pressure Asymmetry.2015. [DOI:10.3390/s150820392] [PMID] [PMCID]
12. Alfonso Mora ML, Castellanos Garrido AL, Juan FNR, Hector SB, Laura Daniela TC. Dinámica plantar en pruebas de balance, potencia, velocidad, y servicio en tenistas. Rev Int Med y Ciencias la Act Física y el Deport.1-11.
13. Viviers PL, Viljoen JT, Derman W. A Review of a Decade of Rugby :union: Injury Epidemiology: 2007-2017. Sport Health. 2018;10(3):223-227. [DOI:10.1177/1941738118757178] [PMID] [PMCID]
14. Taylor AE, Kemp S, Trewartha G, Stokes KA. Scrum injury risk in English professional rugby :union:. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(13):1066-1068. [DOI:10.1136/bjsports-2013-092873] [PMID]
15. Medica EM, Hawrylak A, Demidas A. Static and dynamic plantar pressure distribution in amateur marathon runners. J Sport Med Phys Fitness. 2018. [DOI:10.23736/S0022-4707.18.07964-1] [PMID]
16. Uzun A, Aydos L, Kaya M, Pekel HA, Kanatli U. Effect of Soccer Foot Pressure on Pressure Distributions. 2018;6(6):70-76. [DOI:10.11114/jets.v6i6.3118]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Annals of Applied Sport Science

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb