Volume 12 - Spring Supplementary
Ann Appl Sport Sci 2024, 12 - Spring Supplementary: 0-0 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Nguyen Duc T, Nguyen Manh T. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Online Physical Education Teaching toward Students at Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education, Vietnam. Ann Appl Sport Sci 2024; 12
URL: http://aassjournal.com/article-1-1252-en.html
URL: http://aassjournal.com/article-1-1252-en.html
1- Manager of Physical Education Center, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
2- Deputy Director of the Sport Medicine Center, Vietnam Sport Science Institute, Ha Noi, Vietnam. , thangyhtt2@gmail.com
2- Deputy Director of the Sport Medicine Center, Vietnam Sport Science Institute, Ha Noi, Vietnam. , thangyhtt2@gmail.com
Abstract: (485 Views)
Background. In the era of technology development and continuous improvement, all fields of society, including physical education (PE), must necessarily follow technology trends to keep up with the general development speed.
Objectives. The study is to evaluate the effectiveness of online teaching of PE at HCMUTE, thereby serving as a basis for improvement of this activity.
Methods. Survey questions were carried out to measure the evaluation of indicators affecting student satisfaction with the effectiveness of online teaching of PE at HCMUTE. 400 male and female students with normal health, participating in online PE and non-sports majors. Data analysis in this study was supported by the SPSS Version 22 application.
Results. The topic has selected 04 indicators that satisfy the conditions. Accordingly, the indicator of “Self-learning” is highly appreciated by students (X=3.90 - Agree level, P>0.05); the factors related to the indicator of “Protecting your health, avoiding disease” were assessed by students as normal (X=3.11 - Normal level, P>0.05); The indicator of “Technology applications to support online learning of PE” was highly appreciated by students (X=4.14 - within the Totally Agree range, P>0.05); The indicator of “New way of interacting when learning PE online” is highly appreciated by students when it has X=4.17 within Totally Agree, P>0.05.
Conclusion. Research results show that most students participating in the survey see the positive effects of studying PE online - something they have not felt before; In which, interactive activities and technology application play an important role.
Objectives. The study is to evaluate the effectiveness of online teaching of PE at HCMUTE, thereby serving as a basis for improvement of this activity.
Methods. Survey questions were carried out to measure the evaluation of indicators affecting student satisfaction with the effectiveness of online teaching of PE at HCMUTE. 400 male and female students with normal health, participating in online PE and non-sports majors. Data analysis in this study was supported by the SPSS Version 22 application.
Results. The topic has selected 04 indicators that satisfy the conditions. Accordingly, the indicator of “Self-learning” is highly appreciated by students (X=3.90 - Agree level, P>0.05); the factors related to the indicator of “Protecting your health, avoiding disease” were assessed by students as normal (X=3.11 - Normal level, P>0.05); The indicator of “Technology applications to support online learning of PE” was highly appreciated by students (X=4.14 - within the Totally Agree range, P>0.05); The indicator of “New way of interacting when learning PE online” is highly appreciated by students when it has X=4.17 within Totally Agree, P>0.05.
Conclusion. Research results show that most students participating in the survey see the positive effects of studying PE online - something they have not felt before; In which, interactive activities and technology application play an important role.
Full-Text [PDF 631 kb]
(332 Downloads)
APPLICABLE REMARKS
APPLICABLE REMARKS
- HCMUTE needs to consider the barriers in teaching and learning PE online to promptly adjust the shortcomings in physical education activities at the University as surveyed.
- It is important to note the indicators selected by the topic to evaluate the effectiveness of teaching and learning PE online, thereby making adjustments and additional changes to make this activity more and more effective and comprehensive, contributing to the general education and training mission of the University.
- HCMUTE needs to recognize and promote the effectiveness of teaching and learning PE online, continue to apply, and be ready to respond proactively to teaching PE online when there is an epidemic.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Physical Education Learning
Received: 2023/09/1 | Accepted: 2023/11/5
Received: 2023/09/1 | Accepted: 2023/11/5
References
1. 1. Trabelsi K, Chtourou H. Teaching Physical Education During Ramadan Observance: Practical Recommendations. Int J Sport Stud Health. 2019;2(1):e88013. [DOI:10.5812/intjssh.88013]
2. Maatuk AM, Elberkawi EK, Aljawarneh S, Rashaideh H, Alharbi H. The COVID-19 pandemic and E-learning: challenges and opportunities from the perspective of students and instructors. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 2022;34(1):21-38. [DOI:10.1007/s12528-021-09274-2] [PMID] [PMCID]
3. Singh G, O'Donoghue J, Worton H. A study into the effects of elearning on higher education. Journal of university teaching & learning practice. 2005;2(1):16-27. [DOI:10.53761/1.2.1.3]
4. H'mida C, H'mida S, H. C. Evolution of Attention During A Teaching Lesson of "Anatomy" in Physical Education Degree' Students: The Time of Day Effect. Int J Sport Stud Health. 2019;2(2):e97776. [DOI:10.5812/intjssh.97776]
5. Briggs IM, Myers IB, Myers PB. Gifts differing: Understanding personality type: Davies-Black; 1995.
6. Piccoli G, Ahmad R, Ives B. Web-Based Virtual Learning Environments: A Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effectiveness in Basic IT Skills Training. MIS Quarterly. 2001;25(4):401-26. [DOI:10.2307/3250989]
7. Eom SB, Wen HJ, Ashill N. The Determinants of Students' Perceived Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction in University Online Education: An Empirical Investigation*. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education. 2006;4(2):215-35. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4609.2006.00114.x]
8. Liaw S-S. Investigating students' perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education. 2008;51(2):864-73. [DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.005]
9. Bhuasiri W, Xaymoungkhoun O, Zo H, Rho JJ, Ciganek AP. Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers & Education. 2012;58(2):843-55. [DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.010]
10. Musa MA, Othman MS. Critical success factor in e-Learning: an examination of technology and student factors. International Journal of Advances in Engineering & Technology. 2012;3(2):140.
11. Ali S, Uppal MA, Gulliver SR. A conceptual framework highlighting e-learning implementation barriers. Information Technology & People. 2018;31(1):156-80. [DOI:10.1108/ITP-10-2016-0246]
12. Rhim HC, Han H. Teaching online: foundational concepts of online learning and practical guidelines. Korean J Med Educ. 2020;32(3):175-83. [DOI:10.3946/kjme.2020.171] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Hair Jr., F. J. Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs; 1998.
14. Zheng W, Ma Y-Y, Lin H-L. Research on Blended Learning in Physical Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Chinese Students. SAGE Open. 2021;11(4):21582440211058196. [DOI:10.1177/21582440211058196]
15. Petrusic T, Stemberger V. Effective physical education distance learning models during the COVID-19 epidemic. CEPS Journal. 2021;11(Special Issue):291-308. [DOI:10.26529/cepsj.1118]
16. Korcz A, Krzysztoszek J, Łopatka M, Popeska B, Podnar H, Filiz B, et al. Physical Education Teachers' Opinion about Online Teaching during the COVID-19 Pandemic-Comparative Study of European Countries. Sustainability [Internet]. 2021; 13(21). [DOI:10.3390/su132111730]
17. Dhawan S. Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 2020;49(1):5-22. [DOI:10.1177/0047239520934018] [PMCID]
18. Diciano J, Mateo W, Junior RJ, Versoza JI, Tindowen DJ. Students' experiences in learning physical education in an online environment. Edu Sportivo: Indonesian Journal of Physical Education. 2021;2(3):140-54. [DOI:10.25299/es:ijope.2021.vol2(3).7792]
19. Jiang S, Ning CF. Interactive communication in the process of physical education: are social media contributing to the improvement of physical training performance. Universal Access in the Information Society. 2022. [DOI:10.1007/s10209-022-00911-w] [PMID] [PMCID]
20. D'Agostino EM, Urtel M, Webster CA, McMullen J, Culp B. Virtual Physical Education During COVID-19: Exploring Future Directions for Equitable Online Learning Tools. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. 2021;3. [DOI:10.3389/fspor.2021.716566] [PMID] [PMCID]
21. Turley C, Graham C. Interaction, Student Satisfaction, and Teacher Time Investment in Online High School Courses. Journal of Online Learning Research. 2019;5(2):169-98.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
