Volume 12 - Autumn Supplementary
Ann Appl Sport Sci 2024, 12 - Autumn Supplementary: 0-0 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Hassan M M, Khalaf H H, Mosleh O A, Hammadi W K, Abdullah S M. The Impact of Mechanical Feedback on Correcting Errors in Overhead Volleyball Serve Performance. Ann Appl Sport Sci 2024; 12
URL: http://aassjournal.com/article-1-1418-en.html
URL: http://aassjournal.com/article-1-1418-en.html
Manaf Majid Hassan1 
, Hameed Hammad Khalaf * 2, Omar Ahmed Mosleh1 , Waleed Khalid Hammadi1 , Shakir Mahmood Abdullah1
, Hameed Hammad Khalaf * 2, Omar Ahmed Mosleh1 , Waleed Khalid Hammadi1 , Shakir Mahmood Abdullah1
1- Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, University of Anbar, Ramadi, Iraq
2- Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, University of Anbar, Ramadi, Iraq ,hameed.h.khalaf@uoanbar.edu.iq
2- Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, University of Anbar, Ramadi, Iraq ,
Abstract: (271 Views)
Background. It is challenging to master the overhead serve in volleyball because of the several ways of positioning the body correctly when hitting the ball and the toss. This skill is incredibly challenging for novices who experience problems positioning different body parts.
Objectives. This work aims to apply mechanical feedback to analyze the mistakes likely to occur in overhead volleyball serves and compare it with the usual verbal and visual feedback.
Methods. This study involved 45 male students from the University of Anbar's College of Physical Education, randomly divided into two groups: one with 25 participants receiving verbal and occasional visual feedback and another with 20 receiving both visual and mechanical feedback. The research measured the kinematic coherence of limb movements and the direction of the serving arm.
Results. The experimental group demonstrated significantly higher gains in kinematic coherence and serving arm accuracy than the control group. Particular improvements were supported by specific p-values (e.g., p<0.001 for kinematic coherence, p=0.002 for serving arm accuracy), demonstrating the higher efficiency of mechanical feedback.
Conclusion. Mechanical feedback improves learning and performance in volleyball overhead serves by enhancing the specificity and timing of feedback regarding player positioning and movement.
Objectives. This work aims to apply mechanical feedback to analyze the mistakes likely to occur in overhead volleyball serves and compare it with the usual verbal and visual feedback.
Methods. This study involved 45 male students from the University of Anbar's College of Physical Education, randomly divided into two groups: one with 25 participants receiving verbal and occasional visual feedback and another with 20 receiving both visual and mechanical feedback. The research measured the kinematic coherence of limb movements and the direction of the serving arm.
Results. The experimental group demonstrated significantly higher gains in kinematic coherence and serving arm accuracy than the control group. Particular improvements were supported by specific p-values (e.g., p<0.001 for kinematic coherence, p=0.002 for serving arm accuracy), demonstrating the higher efficiency of mechanical feedback.
Conclusion. Mechanical feedback improves learning and performance in volleyball overhead serves by enhancing the specificity and timing of feedback regarding player positioning and movement.
Full-Text [PDF 795 kb]
(191 Downloads)
APPLICABLE REMARKS
APPLICABLE REMARKS
• Functional Notes: Mechanical feedback should be systematically applied in volleyball training programs to improve learners' motor skills and reduce errors.
• Study Population: This approach benefits beginner learners and can be adapted to other sports movements involving specific tools.
• Study Population: This approach benefits beginner learners and can be adapted to other sports movements involving specific tools.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Sport Biomechanics and its related branches
Received: 2024/07/13 | Accepted: 2024/10/17
Received: 2024/07/13 | Accepted: 2024/10/17
References
1. 1. Shabaan HE, Madkour AA. Impact of video-backed feedback on learning some fencing skills of Physical Education Boys' College in Alexandria. Sci J Phys Educ Sport. 2022;19(19):107.
2. Severo MC, Paul K, Walentowska W, Moors A, Pourtois G. Neurophysiological evidence for evaluative feedback processing depending on goal relevance. NeuroImage. 2020;215:116857. PMID: 32304885 [DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116857]
3. Petancevski EL, Inns J, Fransen J, Impellizzeri FM. The effect of augmented feedback on the performance and learning of gross motor and sport-specific skills: A systematic review. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2022;63:1-39. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102277]
4. Hijazi MMK. The effect of visual and verbal feedback on the quality of fencing technique. J Theor Appl Phys Educ Sport Sci. 2020;3(1):11-20. [DOI:10.21608/jat.2020.40933.1005]
5. Hamoudi LS. The effect of visual feedback in learning the skill of receiving the serve in volleyball for the deaf and dumb. Sci J Phys Educ Sport Sci. 2017;79(79):411-425.
6. Peeters T, Vleugels J, Garimella R, Truijen S, Saeys W, Verwulgen S. Vibrotactile feedback for correcting aerodynamic position of a cyclist. J Sports Sci. 2020;1-7. PMID: 32529942 [DOI:10.1080/02640414.2020.1776814]
7. Hasan MM, Mosleh OA, Hammad F. The impact of the method of teaching the mediator different speed and mental training to teach some of the offensive skills for beginners in handball. Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 2019;10(12):1375-1380. [DOI:10.37506/v10/i12/2019/ijphrd/192563]
8. Hussein OM, Ibrahim TT. An educational program using kinematic indicators feedback on learning the three-point shooting skill for junior basketball players. Assiut J Sci Arts Phys Educ. 2016;43(2):274.
9. Al-Battawi KAA. The effect of using the reverse learning strategy on mental alertness and the level of serving performance from the top of the confrontation in volleyball for beginners. Sports Sci J. 2020;33(11):140.
10. Helmy MA. Qualitative analysis to evaluate the performance of the skill of serving directed from above in volleyball during the learning stages as an indicator of learning effectiveness. Sci J Phys Educ Sport Sci. 2016;78(3):233.
11. Hossain T, Noghani MA, Sidaway B, Hejrati B. Investigating the efficacy of a tactile feedback system to increase the gait speed of older adults. Hum Mov Sci. 2023;90:103103. PMID: 37257391 [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2023.103103]
12. Scott SH, Cluff T, Lowrey CR, Takei T. Feedback control during voluntary motor actions. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2015;33:85-94. PMID: 25827274 [DOI:10.1016/j.conb.2015.03.006]
13. Huang VS, Haith A, Mazzoni P, Krakauer JW. Rethinking Motor Learning and Savings in Adaptation Paradigms: Model-Free Memory for Successful Actions Combines with Internal Models. Neuron. 2011;70(4):787-801. PMID: 21609832 [DOI:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.04.012]
14. Van Wieringen PCW, Emmen HH, Bootsma RJ, Hoogesteger M, Whiting HTA. The effect of video-feedback on the learning of the tennis service by intermediate players. J Sports Sci. 1989;7(2):153-162. PMID: 2810468 [DOI:10.1080/02640418908729833]
15. Guadagnoli M, Holcomb W, Davis M. The efficacy of video feedback for learning the golf swing. J Sports Sci. 2002;20(8):615-622. PMID: 12190281 [DOI:10.1080/026404102320183176]
16. Thow JL, Naemi R, Sanders RH. Comparison of modes of feedback on glide performance in swimming. J Sports Sci. 2012;30(1):43-52. PMID: 22168429 [DOI:10.1080/02640414.2011.624537]
17. Eom HJ, Schutz RW. Statistical Analyses of Volleyball Team Performance. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1992;63(1):11-18. PMID: 1574656 [DOI:10.1080/02701367.1992.10607551]
18. Hasan UC, Hasan EES. Effect of delayed mechanical feedback on long jump performance. Hum Mov. 2022;23(4):140-147. [DOI:10.5114/hm.2022.108320]
19. Potdevin F, Vors O, Huchez A, Lamour M, Davids K, Schnitzler C. How can video feedback be used in physical education to support novice learning in gymnastics? Effects on motor learning, self-assessment, and motivation. Phys Educ Sport Pedagogy. 2018;23(6):1-16. [DOI:10.1080/17408989.2018.1485138]
20. Boothroyd M, Noble J, Kent M, Komar J, Chow JY. The effectiveness of video feedback on cognitive performance: A review of evidence from neurophysiological, kinematic and sporting domains. Int J Psychophysiol. 2017;114:1-11.
21. Baudry L, Leroy D, Thouvarecq R, Chollet D. Auditory concurrent feedback benefits on the circle performed in gymnastics. J Sports Sci. 2006;24(2):149-156. PMID: 16368624 [DOI:10.1080/02640410500130979]
22. Silva LC, Pereira-Monfredini CF, Teixeira LA. Improved children's motor learning of the basketball free shooting pattern by associating subjective error estimation and extrinsic feedback. J Sports Sci. 2016;35(18):1825-1830. PMID: 27710197 [DOI:10.1080/02640414.2016.1239025]
23. Nicaise V, Bois JE, Fairclough SJ, Amorose AJ, Cogérino G. Girls' and boys' perceptions of physical education teachers' feedback: Effects on performance and psychological responses. J Sports Sci. 2007;25(8):915-926. PMID: 17474045 [DOI:10.1080/02640410600898095]
24. Hassan MM, Khalaf HH, Mosleh OA. Impact of Instant Visual Guidance via Video Technology on the Correction of Some Offensive Skills Performance Errors in Basketball. Asian Journal of Sports Medicine. 2023;14(4). [DOI:10.5812/asjsm-135841]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
