Articles In Press / Online First
Back to the articles list |
Back to browse issues page
Dynamic Plantar Pressure Patterns and Their Role in Optimizing Energy Transfer During the Golf Swing
1- Department of Interdisciplinary Science and Internationalization, Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
2- School of Sports Science, Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand. ,rachnavy@sut.ac.th
3- School of Ceramic Engineering, Institute of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
4- School of Telecommunication Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
2- School of Sports Science, Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand. ,
3- School of Ceramic Engineering, Institute of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
4- School of Telecommunication Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
Abstract: (291 Views)
Background. Transferring energy from the lower extremities to the torso is a crucial mechanism enabling an effective golf swing. However, the optimal plantar pressure distribution that facilitates this energy flow has not been thoroughly investigated.
Objectives. This study explored the relationship and predictive potential between peak in-shoe plantar pressures at specific locations and the mechanical energy flow to the torso region during the golf swing.
Methods. Thirty amateur golfers, each with a handicap between 0 and 15, participated in this study. This range represents golfers with moderate skill levels, including highly skilled amateurs (closer to 0) and intermediate players (closer to 15). Plantar pressure distribution was recorded with instrumented insoles, and torso energy flow was measured using a 3D motion analysis system and force plate. Stepwise regression analysis identified pressure locations contributing to energy transfer (p<0.05).
Results. Peak plantar pressures at the right medial metatarsal (β=1.75, t=4.31, p=0.001) and left lateral arch (β=1.35, t=2.22, p=0.048) were positively linked to trunk energy transfer, while left great toe pressure (β=-20.06, t=-4.51, p=0.001) showed a significant negative correlation. The regression model had an R² of 0.80.
Conclusion. The findings suggest optimal plantar pressure supports efficient energy transfer, while pressure in unfavorable locations may hinder swing efficiency.
Objectives. This study explored the relationship and predictive potential between peak in-shoe plantar pressures at specific locations and the mechanical energy flow to the torso region during the golf swing.
Methods. Thirty amateur golfers, each with a handicap between 0 and 15, participated in this study. This range represents golfers with moderate skill levels, including highly skilled amateurs (closer to 0) and intermediate players (closer to 15). Plantar pressure distribution was recorded with instrumented insoles, and torso energy flow was measured using a 3D motion analysis system and force plate. Stepwise regression analysis identified pressure locations contributing to energy transfer (p<0.05).
Results. Peak plantar pressures at the right medial metatarsal (β=1.75, t=4.31, p=0.001) and left lateral arch (β=1.35, t=2.22, p=0.048) were positively linked to trunk energy transfer, while left great toe pressure (β=-20.06, t=-4.51, p=0.001) showed a significant negative correlation. The regression model had an R² of 0.80.
Conclusion. The findings suggest optimal plantar pressure supports efficient energy transfer, while pressure in unfavorable locations may hinder swing efficiency.
Keywords: Golf Biomechanics, Foot Pressure Patterns, Ground Reaction Force, Smart Insole, Energy Flow.
Full-Text [PDF 524 kb]
(98 Downloads)
APPLICABLE REMARKS
APPLICABLE REMARKS
- Integrating plantar pressure assessment and energy transfer evaluation can provide insights into how pressure distribution influences the energy transfer through the kinetic chain during the golf swing.
- Golf footwear design should incorporate findings on optimal plantar pressure zones to enhance stability and efficiency while mitigating injury risks.
- Training programs should focus on balancing plantar pressure during key swing phases to improve kinetic chain efficiency and swing consistency.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Sport Biomechanics and its related branches
Received: 2024/12/14 | Accepted: 2025/02/17
Received: 2024/12/14 | Accepted: 2025/02/17
References
1. 1. Nesbit S, Serrano M. Work and Power Analysis of the Golf Swing. Journal of sports science & medicine. 2005; 4:520-33.
2. Ball K, Best R. Centre of pressure patterns in the golf swing: individual-based analysis. Sports Biomech. 2012; 11(2):175-89. [DOI:10.1080/14763141.2012.673007] [PMID]
3. You X, Xu Y, Liang M, Baker JS, Gu Y. The Relationship between Ground Reaction Forces, Foot Positions and Type of Clubs Used in Golf: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(12). [DOI:10.3390/app13127209]
4. MacKenzie S, McCourt M, Champoux L. How amateur golfers deliver energy to the driver. International Journal of Golf Science. 2020; 8(1).
5. Sheehan WB, Bower RG, Watsford ML. Physical determinants of golf swing performance: A review. J Strength Cond Res. 2022; 36(1):289-97. [DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000003411] [PMID]
6. Smith AC, Roberts JR, Kong PW, Forrester SE. Comparison of centre of gravity and centre of pressure patterns in the golf swing. European Journal of Sport Science. 2017; 17:168-78. [DOI:10.1080/17461391.2016.1240238] [PMID]
7. Chu Y, Sell T, Lephart S. The relationship between biomechanical variables and driving performance during the golf swing. Journal of sports sciences. 2010; 28:1251-9. [DOI:10.1080/02640414.2010.507249] [PMID]
8. Ball K, Best R. Different centre of pressure patterns within the golf stroke I: Cluster analysis. Journal of sports sciences. 2007; 25:757-70.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410600875002 [DOI:10.1080/02640410600874971]
9. Pataky TC. Correlation between maximum in-shoe plantar pressures and clubhead speed in amateur golfers. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2015;33(2):192-7. [DOI:10.1080/02640414.2014.932917] [PMID]
10. Worsfold P, Smith NA, Dyson RJ. Kinetic assessment of golf shoe outer sole design features. J Sports Sci Med. 2009;8(4):607-15.
11. Dong R, Ikuno S. Biomechanical Analysis of Golf Swing Motion Using Hilbert-Huang Transform. Sensors. 2023; 23(15). [DOI:10.3390/s23156698] [PMID] []
12. Outram T, Wheat J. Test-retest reliability of segment kinetic energy measures in the golf swing. Sports Biomechanics. 2021; 20(3):344-59. [DOI:10.1080/14763141.2018.1553244] [PMID]
13. Belotti A, Bisazza N, Calcari A, Perrone P, Biscarini A. The Ground-X-Factor: Training the Proprioceptive and Propulsive Function of the Foot for Improved Technique and Enhanced Performance of the Golf Swing. 2024. [DOI:10.20944/preprints202411.2224.v1]
14. Van Sint Jan S. Color Atlas of Skeletal Landmark Definitions: Guidelines for Reproducible Manual and Virtual Palpations: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier. 2007.
15. Sado N, Yoshioka S, Fukashiro S. Mechanical power flow from trunk and lower limb joint power to external horizontal power in the track and field block start. European Journal of Sport Science. 2022;1-18. [DOI:10.1080/17461391.2022.2109067] [PMID]
16. Lertwonghattakul T, Sriramatr S, Rachnavy P. Analysis of Kinetic Chain Mechanism Affecting Energy Flow in Kick Topspin Tennis Serve in Elite and Amateur Tennis Players. Ann-Appl-Sport-Sci. 2023;11(2):0-. [DOI:10.52547/aassjournal.1133]
17. Suzuki Y, Kobayashi Y, Takizawa M. Effects of Joint Moments on Horizontal and Vertical Velocities of Body Mass Center during Jumping in Different Directions. International Journal of Sport and Health Science. 2018; 16:41-9. [DOI:10.5432/ijshs.201628]
18. A. WD. Biomechanics and Motor control of Human Movement. 4th ed. Hoboken, N.J: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
19. Arata K, Yoshioka S, Fukashiro S. Contribution of Hip Joint Kinetics to Rotate the Pelvis during Baseball Pitching. International Journal of Sport and Health Science. 2020;18. [DOI:10.5432/ijshs.201920]
20. Putnam CA. Sequential motions of body segments in striking and throwing skills: Descriptions and explanations. Journal of Biomechanics. 1993; 26:125-35. [DOI:10.1016/0021-9290(93)90084-R] [PMID]
21. Kenny IC, McCloy AJ, Wallace ES, Otto SR. Segmental sequencing of kinetic energy in a computer-simulated golf swing. Sports Engineering. 2008;11(1):37-45. [DOI:10.1007/s12283-008-0005-0]
22. Hiley MJ, Bajwa Z, Liang Y, Blenkinsop GM. The effect of uphill and downhill slopes on centre of pressure movement, alignment and shot outcome in mid-handicap golfers. Sports Biomechanics. 2021;20(7):781-97. [DOI:10.1080/14763141.2019.1601250] [PMID]
23. Bradshaw E, Keogh J, Hume P, Maulder P, Nortje J, Marnewick M. The Effect of Biological Movement Variability on the Performance of the Golf Swing in High- and Low-Handicapped Players. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 2009;80:185-96.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2009.10599552 [DOI:10.5641/027013609X13087704028156] [PMID]
24. Jones KM, Wallace ES, Otto SR. The relationship between skill and ground reaction force variability in amateur golfers. Sports Biomechanics. 2024;23(10):1625-39. [DOI:10.1080/14763141.2021.1965649] [PMID]
25. Quinn SL, Olivier B, McKinon W. Lower Quadrant Swing Biomechanics Identifies Golfers With Increased Risk of Low Back Pain: A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 2022;31:1-11. [DOI:10.1123/jsr.2021-0191] [PMID]
26. Edwards N, Dickin C, Wang H. Low back pain and golf: A review of biomechanical risk factors. Sports medicine and health science. 2020 Mar 1;2(1):10-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.smhs.2020.03.002] [PMID] []
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
