year 7, Issue 2 (Summer 2019)
Ann Appl Sport Sci 2019, 7(2): 3-12 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Gharaei E, Shojaei M, Daneshfar A. The Validity and Reliability of the Bruininks–Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, 2nd Edition Brief Form, in Preschool Children. Ann Appl Sport Sci 2019; 7 (2) :3-12
URL: http://aassjournal.com/article-1-581-en.html
URL: http://aassjournal.com/article-1-581-en.html
1- Motor Behavior Department, Physical Education Faculty, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Physical Education, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran ,e5shojaei@yahoo.com
3- Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Physical Education, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Physical Education, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran ,
3- Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Physical Education, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (15709 Views)
Background. Evaluating motor skills and using an appropriate tool for the diagnosis and evaluation of motor proficiency in preschool-aged children seems critical.
Objectives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity, reliability, and sensitivity of the Bruininks–Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition Brief Form (BOT-2 BF), in preschool children.
Methods. A total of 306 preschool children (aged four to seven years) participated in this study. To evaluate the validity of the test, the canonical correlation statistic method was used to calculate the correlation between the subscales of this test and the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (MABC) test. To evaluate the reliability by the time reliability method, 50 subjects were retested after an interval of two weeks. The sensitivity analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) tests were used to determine the ability to diagnose a developmental coordination disorder (DCD).
Results. The results of the canonical correlation analysis showed that there is a significant linear relationship (p<0.001) between the BOT-2 and the MABC tests. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC=0.80) was high for time reliability. The appropriate cutoff point was 13. At this point, the area under the ROC curve was 0.91 for sensitivity and 0.93 for the characteristic, and in general, the area under the curve was 0.97.
Conclusion. According to the results of this study, it seems that the BOT-2 has an appropriate validity and reliability as well as a high sensitivity and characteristic in preschool children, and can be used to evaluate motor skills and diagnose children with DCD.
Objectives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity, reliability, and sensitivity of the Bruininks–Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition Brief Form (BOT-2 BF), in preschool children.
Methods. A total of 306 preschool children (aged four to seven years) participated in this study. To evaluate the validity of the test, the canonical correlation statistic method was used to calculate the correlation between the subscales of this test and the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (MABC) test. To evaluate the reliability by the time reliability method, 50 subjects were retested after an interval of two weeks. The sensitivity analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) tests were used to determine the ability to diagnose a developmental coordination disorder (DCD).
Results. The results of the canonical correlation analysis showed that there is a significant linear relationship (p<0.001) between the BOT-2 and the MABC tests. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC=0.80) was high for time reliability. The appropriate cutoff point was 13. At this point, the area under the ROC curve was 0.91 for sensitivity and 0.93 for the characteristic, and in general, the area under the curve was 0.97.
Conclusion. According to the results of this study, it seems that the BOT-2 has an appropriate validity and reliability as well as a high sensitivity and characteristic in preschool children, and can be used to evaluate motor skills and diagnose children with DCD.
Keywords: Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition (BOT-2), Movement Assessment Battery for Children (MABC), Sensitivity and Characteristic, Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD), Preschool Children
Full-Text [PDF 720 kb]
(7900 Downloads)
APPLICABLE REMARKS
APPLICABLE REMARKS
- The BOT-2 has appropriate validity and reliability as well as high sensitivity and characteristic in preschool children.
- The teachers and mentors can use the BOT-2 test to evaluate and screen children aged four to seven years.
- The BOT-2 can be used to evaluate motor skills and diagnose children with DCD.
- In addition to educational and intelligence tests, the BOT-2 test could be used to evaluate children’s major and fine skills.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Received: 2017/10/15 | Accepted: 2017/12/31
Received: 2017/10/15 | Accepted: 2017/12/31
References
1. Yusof SM, Aiman S, Zawi MK, Hasan H, Radzi AAM, editors. Body composition index predict children's motor skills proficiency. Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology; 2013: World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology (WASET).
2. Cairney J, Hay J, Veldhuizen S, Missiuna C, Faught BE. Comparing probable case identification of developmental coordination disorder using the short form of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency and the Movement ABC. Child: care, health and development. 2009;35(3):402-8. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.00957.x]
3. Skinner RA, Piek JP. Psychosocial implications of poor motor coordination in children and adolescents. Human Movement Science. 2001;20(1):73-94. [DOI:10.1016/S0167-9457(01)00029-X]
4. Piek JP, Rigoli D, Pearsall-Jones JG, Martin NC, Hay DA, Bennett KS, et al. Depressive symptomatology in child and adolescent twins with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and/or developmental coordination disorder. Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies. 2007;10(4):587-96. [DOI:10.1375/twin.10.4.587] [PMID]
5. Bouffard M, Watkinson EJ, Thompson LP, Dunn JLC, Romanow SKE. A Test of the Activity Deficit Hypothesis with Children With Movement Difficulties. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly. 1996;13(1):61-73. [DOI:10.1123/apaq.13.1.61]
6. Green D, Baird G, Sugden D. A pilot study of psychopathology in Developmental Coordination Disorder. Child: care, health and development. 2006;32(6):741-50. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00684.x]
7. Payne VG, Isaacs L. Human Motor Development: A Lifespan Approach: McGraw-Hill Publishing; 2011. 607 p.
8. Zimmer R. Handbuch der Bewegungserziehung: didaktisch-methodische Grundlagen und Ideen für die Praxis. 9th ed: Herder; 2004. 223 p.
9. Schulz J, Henderson SE, Sugden DA, Barnett AL. Structural validity of the Movement ABC-2 test: factor structure comparisons across three age groups. Research in developmental disabilities. 2011;32(4):1361-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.032] [PMID]
10. Broadhead GD, Bruininks RH. Childhood Motor Performance Traits on the Short Form Bruininks-Oseretsky Test. J Physical Educator. 1982;39(3):149-55.
11. Kambas A, Aggeloussis N. Construct validity of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-short form for a sample of Greek preschool and primary school children. Perceptual and motor skills. 2006;102(1):65-72.
https://doi.org/10.2466/PMS.102.1.65-72 [DOI:10.2466/pms.102.1.65-75] [PMID]
12. Deitz JC, Kartin D, Kopp K. Review of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition (BOT-2). Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics. 2007;27(4):87-102. [DOI:10.1080/J006v27n04_06]
13. MacCobb S, Greene S, Nugent K, O'Mahony P. Measurement and prediction of motor proficiency in children using Bayley infant scales and the Bruininks-Oseretsky test. Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics. 2005;25(1-2):59-79.
https://doi.org/10.1080/J006v25n01_05 [DOI:10.1300/J006v25n01_05] [PMID]
14. Vinçon S, Green D, Blank R, Jenetzky E. Ecological validity of the German Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency – 2nd Edition. Human Movement Science. 2017;53:45-54. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2016.10.005] [PMID]
15. Venetsanou F, Kambas A, Aggeloussis N, Fatouros I, Taxildaris K. Motor assessment of preschool aged children: A preliminary investigation of the validity of the Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency - short form. Hum Mov Sci. 2009;28(4):543-50. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2009.03.002] [PMID]
16. Croce RV, Horvat M, McCarthy E. Reliability and concurrent validity of the movement assessment battery for children. Perceptual and motor skills. 2001;93(1):275-80. [DOI:10.2466/pms.2001.93.1.275] [PMID]
17. Moore JB, Reeve TG, Boan T. Reliability of the Short Form of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency with Five-Year-Old Children. Perceptual and motor skills. 1986;62(1):223-6.
https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1977.44.1.223 [DOI:10.2466/pms.1986.62.1.223] [PMID]
18. Venetsanou F, Kambas A, Aggeloussis N, Serbezis V, Taxildaris K. Use of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency for identifying children with motor impairment. Developmental medicine and child neurology. 2007;49(11):846-8. [DOI:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00846.x] [PMID]
19. Beitel PA, Mead BJ. Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency: Further Verification with 3- to 5-Yr.-Old Children. Perceptual and motor skills. 1982;54(1):268-70. [DOI:10.2466/pms.1982.54.1.268]
20. Spironello C, Hay J, Missiuna C, Faught BE, Cairney J. Concurrent and construct validation of the short form of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency and the Movement-ABC when administered under field conditions: implications for screening. Child: care, health and development. 2010;36(4):499-507. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.01066.x]
21. McIntyre F, Parker H, Thornton A, Licari M, Piek J, Rigoli D, et al. Assessing motor proficiency in young adults: The Bruininks Oseretsky Test-2 Short Form and the McCarron Assessment of Neuromuscular Development. Human Movement Science. 2017;53:55-62. [DOI:10.1016/j.humov.2016.10.004] [PMID]
22. Wuang Y-P, Su C-Y. Reliability and responsiveness of the Bruininks–Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-Second Edition in children with intellectual disability. Research in developmental disabilities. 2009;30(5):847-55. [DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2008.12.002] [PMID]
23. Lucas BR, Latimer J, Doney R, Ferreira ML, Adams R, Hawkes G, et al. The Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-Short Form is reliable in children living in remote Australian Aboriginal communities. BMC Pediatrics. 2013;13(1):135. [DOI:10.1186/1471-2431-13-135] [PMID] [PMCID]
24. Lam HMY. Assessment of preschoolers' gross motor proficiency: revisiting Bruininks–Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency. J Early Child Development Care. 2011;181(2):189-201. [DOI:10.1080/03004430.2011.536640]
25. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use (5th edition). Australian and New Zealand journal of public health. 2016;40(3):294-5. [DOI:10.1111/1753-6405.12484] [PMID]
26. Barnett LM, van Beurden E, Morgan PJ, Brooks LO, Beard JR. Gender differences in motor skill proficiency from childhood to adolescence: a longitudinal study. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 2010;81(2):162-70.
https://doi.org/10.5641/027013610X13088554297116 [DOI:10.1080/02701367.2010.10599663] [PMID]
27. Bruininks RH, Bruininks BD. BOT2: Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency : Manual. 2nd ed: Pearson Assessments; 2005.
28. Henderson SE, Sugden DA, Barnett AL. Movement assessment battery for children-2: Movement ABC-2 : Examiner's manual. 2nd ed: Harcourt Assessment; 2007.
29. Badami R, Nezakatalhossaini M, Rajabi F, Jafari M. Validity and Reliability of Movement Assessment Battery for Children (M-ABC) in 6-Year-Old Children of Isfahan City. Journal of Motor Learning and Movement. 2015;7(1):105-22 [Article in Farsi].
30. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143(1):29-36. [DOI:10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747] [PMID]
31. Crawford SG, Wilson BN, Dewey D. Identifying developmental coordination disorder: consistency between tests. Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics. 2001;20(2-3):29-50.
https://doi.org/10.1300/J006v20n02_03 [DOI:10.1080/J006v20n02_03] [PMID]
32. Ellinoudis T, Evaggelinou C, Kourtessis T, Konstantinidou Z, Venetsanou F, Kambas A. Reliability and validity of age band 1 of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children – Second Edition. Research in developmental disabilities. 2011;32(3):1046-51. [DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.035] [PMID]
33. White E, Schroeder L, Wright P, Rubin D, Rose DJ, Wiersma L. Reliability of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency in Children and Adolescents with Prader-Willi Syndrome. ACSM; 2012.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
