year 6, Issue 3 (Autumn 2018)
Ann Appl Sport Sci 2018, 6(3): 39-52 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Fortier J, Nauroy E, St-Pierre M, Roult R, Carbonneau H. Between the Strategic Summit and the Operational Centre: An Organizational Analysis of the “Choisir de Gagner” Sport Project for Youth with Disabilities. Ann Appl Sport Sci 2018; 6 (3) :39-52
URL: http://aassjournal.com/article-1-660-en.html
URL: http://aassjournal.com/article-1-660-en.html
1- Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (UQTR), Department of Leisure, Culture and Tourism, Trois-Rivières, Canada
2- Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (UQTR), Department of Leisure, Culture and Tourism, Trois-Rivières, Canada ,romain.roult@uqtr.ca
2- Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (UQTR), Department of Leisure, Culture and Tourism, Trois-Rivières, Canada ,
Abstract: (6543 Views)
Background. Choisir de Gagner is a Quebec (Canada) company associated to AlterGo and Défi sportif. Its mission is to promote a healthy lifestyle for youth with disabilities.
Objectives. This article analyzes this organization, especially its strengths and weaknesses of its environments.
Methods. The study took place over a three-year period, from 2012-2015. The first two data collections (2012-2013 and 2013-2014) aimed at analyzing the organization’s internal components. In reference to these results, the third collection’s goal (2015) was to analyze the transfer of knowledge that was developed during the organization’s mandate.
Results. Moreover, following the first data collection, a few weaknesses were identified regarding time management and the decision-making process. With regard to these results, certain adjustments were made in the organization which have led to a considerable improvement if we rely on the results from the second data collection. At the end of the article, the organization’s external communication is specifically examined by an analysis of the transfer of knowledge. Several tools have been elaborated by the organization between 2012 and 2015.
Conclusion. The main issues with respect to these tools are the respect and follow-up of each stage of the transfer process in order to ensure its sustainability.
Objectives. This article analyzes this organization, especially its strengths and weaknesses of its environments.
Methods. The study took place over a three-year period, from 2012-2015. The first two data collections (2012-2013 and 2013-2014) aimed at analyzing the organization’s internal components. In reference to these results, the third collection’s goal (2015) was to analyze the transfer of knowledge that was developed during the organization’s mandate.
Results. Moreover, following the first data collection, a few weaknesses were identified regarding time management and the decision-making process. With regard to these results, certain adjustments were made in the organization which have led to a considerable improvement if we rely on the results from the second data collection. At the end of the article, the organization’s external communication is specifically examined by an analysis of the transfer of knowledge. Several tools have been elaborated by the organization between 2012 and 2015.
Conclusion. The main issues with respect to these tools are the respect and follow-up of each stage of the transfer process in order to ensure its sustainability.
Keywords: Organization, Management, Evaluation, Transfer of Knowledge, Healthy Lifestyle, Physical Activity
Full-Text [PDF 919 kb]
(1061 Downloads)
APPLICABLE REMARKS
APPLICABLE REMARKS
• Within an organization, the hierarchy between management and employees plays a major role. It is important to implement a decision-making process in order to make each person’s role clear and understandable.
• Sound and effective communication with the operational center (stakeholders and coordinators), within the strategic summit (managers), and between the two (line of command), remains fundamental in any organization. It is relevant to provide follow-up.
• It is important to make available and accessible the knowledge developed within the organization, especially in order to improve action. Respect for each step of the transfer of knowledge process remains essential.
• Sound and effective communication with the operational center (stakeholders and coordinators), within the strategic summit (managers), and between the two (line of command), remains fundamental in any organization. It is relevant to provide follow-up.
• It is important to make available and accessible the knowledge developed within the organization, especially in order to improve action. Respect for each step of the transfer of knowledge process remains essential.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Sport Management and its related branches
Received: 2018/07/2 | Accepted: 2018/08/18
Received: 2018/07/2 | Accepted: 2018/08/18
References
1. Institut de la statistique du Québec. 2013 Institut de la statistique Report : Enquête québécoise sur les limitations d'activités, les maladies chroniques et le vieillissement 2010-2011. Utilisation des services de santé et des services sociaux des personnes avec incapacité, volume 2. Québec, Canada : Gouvernement du Québec, 2013.
2. Institut de la statistique du Québec. 2012 Institut de la statistique Report : L'enquête québécoise sur la santé des jeunes du secondaire 2010-2011. Tome 1 Le visage des jeunes d'aujourd'hui : leur santé physique et leurs habitudes de vie. Québec, Canada : Gouvernement du Québec, 2012.
3. Altergo; c2016 2016 17 september. Available from : http://www.altergo.ca/fr/AlterGo.
4. Défi sportif Altergo; c2016 2016 17 september. Available from : http://www.defisportif.com/fr/cdg/evenements.php.
5. Québec en forme; c2016 [2016 17 september]. Available from : http://www.quebecenforme.org/a-propos/mission.aspx.
6. Bergeron PG. La gestion dynamique: concepts, méthodes et applications. 4th ed: Les Éditions de la Chenelière inc.; 2006. 653 p.
7. Posavac EJ, Carey RG. Program evaluation: Methods and case studies. 7th ed: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2007. 336 p.
8. Mintzberg H. Mintzberg on management: Inside our strange world of organizations. Free Press, Collier Macmillan Publishers; 1989. 418 p.
9. Morgan G. Images de l'organisation. Les Presses de l'Université Laval; 1999. 498 p.
10. Kalateh Seifari M, Amoozadeh Z. The Relationship of Organizational Culture and Entrepreneurship with Effectiveness in Sport Organizations. Annals of Applied Sport Science. 2014; 2(3): 51-60. [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.aassjournal.2.3.51]
11. Livian YF. Organisation, théories et pratiques. 2th ed; Éditions Dunod; 2001. 322 p.
12. Kerwin S, Maclean J, Bell-Laroche D. The Mediating Influence of Management by Values in Nonprofit Sport Organizations. Journal of Sport Management. 2014; 28(6): 646-56. [DOI:10.1123/JSM.2013-0303]
13. Ashouri T, Boroumand M. R. The Relationship between Knowledge Management and the Process of Entrepreneurship in Sport Organizations. Annals of Applied Sport Science. 2014; 2(3): 41-56. [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.aassjournal.2.3.41]
14. Faye C, Lortie M, Desmarais L. 2007 Réseau de recherche en santé et en sécurité du travail du Québec Report : Guide sur le transfert des connaissances à l'intention des chercheurs en santé et sécurité du travail. Québec, Canada : Réseau de recherche en santé et en sécurité du travail du Québec, 2007.
15. Syed Omar Sharifuddin SI, Fytton R. Knowledge management in a public organization: A study on the relationship between organizational elements and the performance of knowledge transfer. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2004;8(2):95-111. [DOI:10.1108/13673270410529145]
16. Zarinpoush F, Von Sychowski S, Sperling J. 2007 Imagine Canada Report : Transfert et échange efficaces de connaissances : un cadre de travail à l'intention des organismes sans but lucratif. Ontario, Canada : Imagine Canada, 2007.
17. Raymond L. 2009 Laboratoire de recherche sur la dynamique du transfert des connaissances de l'Université de Sherbrooke Report : Coffre à outils sur le transfert des connaissances. Une approche proactive. Québec, Canada : Laboratoire de recherche sur la dynamique du transfert des connaissances (LRTDC) de l'Université de Sherbrooke, 2009.
18. Institut national de santé publique du Québec. 2009 Institut national de santé publique Report : Animer un processus de transfert des connaissances. Bilan des connaissances et outil d'animation. Direction de la recherche, formation et développement. Québec, Canada : Gouvernement du Québec, 2009.
19. CSSS de la Vieille-Capitale, Université Laval. 2015 Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec Report : Cadre de référence en transfert de connaissances pour leurs utilisations judicieuses et le soutien à l'innovation. Québec, Canada : Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec, 2015.
20. Green WL, Ottoson MJ, Garcia C, Hiatt AR. Diffusion theory and knowledge dissemination, utilization, and integration in public health. Annual Review of Public Health. 2009;30(1):151-74. [DOI:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100049] [PMID]
21. Harvey JF. Comment favoriser le partage des connaissances? Le cas des communautés de pratiques pilotées. Gestion. 2004;35(4):73-80. [DOI:10.3917/riges.354.0073]
22. Choisir de Gagner; c2016 [2016 21 september]. Available from : http://choisirdegagner.com.
23. Extenso; c2016 [2016 28 september]. Available from : http://www.extenso.org/a-propos-d-extenso/.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
