year 7, Issue 4 (Winter 2019)                   Ann Appl Sport Sci 2019, 7(4): 9-16 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Azadi A, Zarei A, Tojari F. The Effect of Purchasing Welfare on Consumer Purchasing Behavior: the Role of Mediator Attitudes. Ann Appl Sport Sci. 2019; 7 (4) :9-16
URL: http://aassjournal.com/article-1-687-en.html
1- Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
2- Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran , dr_alizarei@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (1040 Views)
Background. Despite the research being accomplished so far, there is no clear answer to the question whether purchasing welfare is affected by the attitude of customer purchasing behavior.
Objectives. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of purchasing welfare on consumer purchasing behavior and to assess the mediator role of attitudes in this regard.
Methods. This was a descriptive-correlational study conducted using a survey method. The statistical population of the study consisted of all young consumers of sporting goods (15-30 years old) in Isfahan city. In this study, there were 23 free parameters in the proposed model. The sample size was considered for each free parameter of 15 people. Finally, 350 people were estimated. Purchasing welfare (Edley et al., 2013), attitudes (Lee and Trill, 2012) and consumer purchasing behavior (Edwards, 1998) were used as the instruments and their face and content validity and reliability were confirmed (0.75, 0.80, 0.81). Data were analyzed using Amos-22 software.
Results. The research model had a favorable fit. Also, the mediator attitude was a partial relationship between purchasing welfare and purchase behavior (P < 0.05).
Conclusion. Consumer welfare increased the behavior of consumer purchasing, but with the increasing consumer attitude in the relationship, the impact of purchasing prosperity on behavior increased.
Full-Text [PDF 639 kb]   (475 Downloads)    
 
 
APPLICABLE REMARKS
- It is suggested to marketers to evaluate the satisfaction of their products in regular periods through field surveys among the consumer, and to note that as long as consumer satisfaction is high, his purchasing behavior increases from that product.
- Marketers and manufacturers should note that changing consumer attitudes is a gradual process that can gradually increase consumer purchasing.
- Consumers are advised to make a general program that is tailored to their needs before purchasing.

Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Sport Management and its related branches
Received: 2018/09/4 | Accepted: 2018/12/1 | Published: 2019/11/7

References
1. Schiffman L, Kanuk L. Consumer behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2010.
2. Funk D. Consumer behavior for sport & events: Marketing action. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann/Elsevier; 2008.
3. Shilbury D, Westerbeek H, Quick S, Funk Karg D. Strategic sport marketing. Crow Nest, NSW Australia: Allen & Un win Academic; 2014.
4. Baker BJ, McDonald H, Funk DC. The uniqueness of sport: Testing against marketing's empirical laws. Sport Manag Rev. 2016;19(4):378-90. [DOI:10.1016/j.smr.2016.02.002]
5. Ciomaga B. Sport management: a bibliometric study on central themes and trends. Eur Sport Manag Q. 2013;13(5):557-78. [DOI:10.1080/16184742.2013.838283]
6. Chelladurai P. Introduction to the Second Inaugural Issue of the Journal of Global Sport Management. J Global Sport Manag. 2016;1(3-4):67-9. [DOI:10.1080/24704067.2016.1245514]
7. Shilbury D. A bibliometric analysis of four sport management journals. Sport Manag Rev. 2011;14(4):434-52. [DOI:10.1016/j.smr.2010.11.005]
8. Funk DC, Beaton A, Alexandris K. Sport consumer motivation: Autonomy and control orientations that regulate fan behaviours. Sport Manag Rev. 2012;15(3):355-67. [DOI:10.1016/j.smr.2011.11.001]
9. Yoshida M, James JD, Cronin JJ. Sport event innovativeness: Conceptualization, measurement, and its impact on consumer behavior. Sport Manag Rev. 2013;16(1):68-84. [DOI:10.1016/j.smr.2012.03.003]
10. Funk D. Sport consumer behavior: Marketing strategies. Abingdon, Oxon,UK: UK:Routledge; 2016. [DOI:10.4324/9781315691909]
11. Pappas N. Marketing strategies, perceived risks, and consumer trust in online buying behaviour. J Retail Consum Serv. 2016;29:92-103. [DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.11.007]
12. Blackwell R, DSouza C, Taghian M, Miniard P, Engel J. Consumer behaviour: an Asia Pacific approach: Thomson; 2006.
13. ÖZhan DedeoĞLu A, KazanÇOĞLu İ. Consumer Guilt: A Model of Its Antecedents and Consequences. Ege Acad Rev. 2012;12(1):9-. [DOI:10.21121/eab.2012119542]
14. Peloza J, White K, Shang J. Good and Guilt-Free: The Role of Self-Accountability in Influencing Preferences for Products with Ethical Attributes. J Market. 2013;77(1):104-19. [DOI:10.1509/jm.11.0454]
15. El Hedhli K, Chebat J-C, Sirgy MJ. Shopping well-being at the mall: Construct, antecedents, and consequences. J Busin Res. 2013;66(7):856-63. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.06.011]
16. Babin BJ, Darden WR, Griffin M. Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value. J Consum Res. 1994;20(4):644. [DOI:10.1086/209376]
17. Lee M. The effects of product information on consumer attitudes and purchase intentions of fashion products made of fur, leather, and wool. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University; 2014.
18. Montano D, Kasprzyk D. Theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, and the integrated behavioral model. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008.
19. Spector P. Job satisfaction: application, assessment, cause, and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1997. [DOI:10.4135/9781452231549]
20. Sirgy MJ, Lee D-J, Kressmann F. A Need-Based Measure of Consumer Well Being (CWB) in Relation to Personal Transportation: Nomological Validation. Soc Indicat Res. 2006;79(2):337-67. [DOI:10.1007/s11205-005-4920-1]
21. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting behavior. Prentice Hall: New Jersey; 1980.
22. Kim H, Karpova E. Consumer Attitudes Toward Fashion Counterfeits: Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Clothing Textiles Res J. 2009;28(2):79-94. [DOI:10.1177/0887302X09332513]
23. Lock D, Filo K, Kunkel T, Skinner JL. The Development of a Framework to Capture Perceptions of Sport Organizations Legitimacy. J Sport Manag. 2015;29(4):362-79. [DOI:10.1123/jsm.2014-0005]
24. Lim CH, Kim K, Cheong Y. Factors affecting sportswear buying behavior: A comparative analysis of luxury sportswear. J Busin Res. 2016;69(12):5793-800. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.176]
25. Yadav R, Pathak GS. Young consumers' intention towards buying green products in a developing nation: Extending the theory of planned behavior. J Clean Prod. 2016;135:732-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.120]
26. Park S, Kim Y. The effect of curiosity on the sport media consumption behaviours. Kor J Psychol Ind Organ. 2008;21:493-521.
27. Park S, Kim Y, Park S, In S. The moderating effect of the levels of sport media consumption on consumers' new consumptive behaviors: The epistemic process of sport spectating. Kor J Consum Advert Psychol. 2009;10:437-59.
28. Badgaiyan AJ, Verma A. Does urge to buy impulsively differ from impulsive buying behaviour? Assessing the impact of situational factors. J Retail Consum Serv. 2015;22:145-57. [DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.10.002]
29. Kwon Y, Kwak DH. Revisiting the team identification-value-purchase relationship in the team-licensed merchandise consumption context: A multidimensional consumer value approach. Sport Market Q. 2014;23(2):100.
30. Kwon HH, Trail G, James JD. The Mediating Role of Perceived Value: Team Identification and Purchase Intention of Team-Licensed Apparel. J Sport Manag. 2007;21(4):540-54. [DOI:10.1123/jsm.21.4.540]
31. James J, Trail G. The relevance of team identification to sport consumption behavior intentions. Int J Sport Manag. 2008;9(4):427-40.
32. Shapiro SL, Ridinger LL, Trail GT. An Analysis of Multiple Spectator Consumption Behaviors, Identification, and Future Behavioral Intentions Within the Context of a New College Football Program. JvSport Manag. 2013;27(2):130-45. [DOI:10.1123/jsm.27.2.130]
33. Trail GT, Anderson DF, Fink JS. Consumer satisfaction and identity theory: A model of sport spectator conative loyalty. Sport Market Q. 2005;14(2).

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


© 2017 All Rights Reserved | Annals of Applied Sport Science

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb