year 7, Issue 3 (Autumn 2019)                   Ann Appl Sport Sci 2019, 7(3): 21-30 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Sozen H, Erdogan E, Ince A, Soylu A R. Determination of Electromyography-Based Coordinated Fatigue Levels in Agonist and Antagonist Muscles of the Thigh during Squat Press Exercise. Ann Appl Sport Sci. 2019; 7 (3) :21-30
1- School of Physical Education and Sport, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey ,
2- School of Physical Education and Sport, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey
3- Department of Biophysics, Medical Faculty, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
Abstract:   (1193 Views)
Background. Simultaneous tiredness of two or more muscles around a joint can be defined as coordinated fatigue (co-fatigue) and might occur between agonist and antagonist muscles, and vary according to the level of sporting activity levels or gender.
Objectives. The aim of this study was to determine the levels of coordinated fatigue in agonist and antagonist muscles during squat-press exercise.
Methods. Twenty athletes and twenty sedentary subjects participated in the study. Surface electromyography signals of the rectus femoris, vastus lateralis obliquus, biceps femoris and semitendinosus muscles were recorded at the squat press position for 15 seconds during isometric contraction. Measurements were repeated five times and a 2-minute rest period was allowed between repetitions. After erroneous EMG elimination, movement artefacts were removed by using a 20 Hz high-pass Butterworth filter. Then, as a well-recognized fatigue index, the median frequency (MF) of each filtered middle part of the EMG signal (5 to 10 s. of contraction) was calculated, given that it is known that the MF decreases during isometric contractions. Finally, each MF-based co-fatigue index was calculated by dividing the mean RF and VLO median frequencies by the mean ST and BF median frequencies. The cumulative co-fatigue values of “male vs. female” and “sedentary vs. athlete” comparisons were performed by using a two-sided Student t-test with a Bonferroni correction.
Results. There was a statistically significant (Bonferroni corrected p-value < 0.05) difference between the mean female (1.57 ∓ 0.53) and the mean male (1.23 0.17) co-fatigue values, while there was no statistically significant difference between the mean co-fatigue values of sedentary (1.51 0.52) and athlete (1.29 0.27) subjects.
Conclusion. The offered co-fatigue indices might be useful for other sports, physiotherapy and related areas if sufficient scientific proof is accumulated.
Full-Text [PDF 668 kb]   (404 Downloads)    
  • Simultaneous tiredness of two or more muscles around a joint can be defined as coordinated fatigue (cofatigue) and might occur between agonist and antagonist muscles, and vary according to the level of sporting activity levels or gender.

Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Sport Physiology and its related branches
Received: 2019/02/19 | Accepted: 2019/04/28 | Published: 2019/05/3

1. Enoka RM, Stuart DG. Neurobiology of muscle fatigue. J Appl Physiol. 1992; 72, 1631-1648. [DOI:10.1152/jappl.1992.72.5.1631] [PMID]
2. Pincivero DM., Aldworth C., Dickerson T., Petry C., & Shultz T. Quadriceps-hamstring EMG activity during functional closed kinetic chain exercise to fatigue. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000;81:504-509. [DOI:10.1007/s004210050075] [PMID]
3. Aagaard P, Simonsen EB, Andersen JL, Magnusson SP, Bojsen-Moller F, Dyhre-Poulsen P. Antagonist muscle coactivation during isokinetic knee extension. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 2000;10(2):58-67. [DOI:10.1034/j.1600-0838.2000.010002058.x]
4. Sapsford RR, Hodges PW, Richardson CA, Cooper DH, Markwell SJ, Jull GA. Co-activation of the abdominal and pelvic floor muscle during voluntary exercises. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2001;20:31-42.<31::AID-NAU5>3.0.CO;2-P [DOI:10.1002/1520-6777(2001)20:13.0.CO;2-P]
5. Kellis E, Arabatzi F, Papadopoulos C. Muscle co-activation around the knee in drop jumping using the co-contraction index. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2003;13(3):229-238. [DOI:10.1016/S1050-6411(03)00020-8]
6. Harput G, Soylu AR, Ertan H, Ergun N, Mattacola CG. Effect of gender on the quadriceps-to-hamstrings coactivation ratio during different exercises. J Sport Reh.2014;23:36-43. [DOI:10.1123/JSR.2012-0120] [PMID]
7. Dewald JPA, Pope PS, Given JD, Buchanan TS, Rymer WZ. Abnormal muscle coactivation patterns during isometric torque generation at the elbow and shoulder in hemiparetic subjects. Brain. 1995;118(2):495-510. [DOI:10.1093/brain/118.2.495] [PMID]
8. Dimitrova NA, Dimitrov GV. Interpretation of EMG changes with fatigue: facts, pitfalls, and fallacies. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2003;13(1):13-36. [DOI:10.1016/S1050-6411(02)00083-4]
9. Merletti R, Knaflitz M, DeLuca CJ. Electrically evoked myoelectric signals. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering. 1992;19(4):293-340.
10. DeLuca CJ. The use of surface electromyography in Biomechanics. Journal of Applied Biomechanics. 1997;13(2):135-163. [DOI:10.1123/jab.13.2.135]
11. Farina D, Gazzoni M, Merletti R. Assessment of low back muscle fatigue by surface EMG signal: Methodological Aspects. J. Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2003;13:319-332. [DOI:10.1016/S1050-6411(03)00040-3]
12. Georgakis A, Stergioulas LK, Giakas G. Fatigue analysis of the surface EMG signal in isometric constant force contractions using the average instantaneous frequency. IEEE Trans. on Biomedical Engineering. 2003;50(2):262-265. [DOI:10.1109/TBME.2002.807641] [PMID]
13. Soylu AR, Arpinar-Avsar P. Detection of surface electromyography recording time interval without muscle fatigue effect for biceps brachii muscle during maximum voluntary contraction. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2010;20(4):773-776. [DOI:10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.02.006] [PMID]
14. Baratta R, Solomonow M, Zhou BH, Letson D, Chuinard R, D'Ambrosia R. Muscle coactivation. The role of the antagonist musculature in maintaining knee stability. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1988;16:113-122. [DOI:10.1177/036354658801600205] [PMID]
15. Carolan B, Cafarelli E. Adaptations in coactivation after isometric resistance training. Journal of Applied Physiology. 1992;73(3):911-917. [DOI:10.1152/jappl.1992.73.3.911] [PMID]
16. Choi H. Quantitative assessment of co-contraction in cervical musculature. Medical Engineering & Physics. 2003;25(2):133-140. [DOI:10.1016/S1350-4533(02)00151-0]
17. Mathur S, Eng JJ, Macientyre DL. Reliability of surface EMG during sustained contractions of the quadriceps. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2005;15(1):102-110. [DOI:10.1016/j.jelekin.2004.06.003] [PMID]
18. Santos MCA, Semeghuini TA, Azevedo FM, Colugnati DB, Negrao FRF, Alves N, Arida RM. Analysis of localized muscular fatigue in athletes and sedentary subjects through frequency parameters of electromyographic signal. Brazilian Journal of Sports Medicine. 2008;14(6):509-512. [DOI:10.1590/S1517-86922008000600007]
19. Callaghan MJ, Mccarthy CJ, Oldham JA. The reliability of surface electromyography to assess quadriceps fatigue during multi joint tasks in healthy and painful knees. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2009;19(1):172-180. [DOI:10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.05.004] [PMID]
20. Silva CR, Silva DO, Aragao FA, Ferrari D, Alves N, Azevedo FM. Influence of nerumuscular fatigue on co-contraction between vastus medialis and vastus lateralis during isometric contractions. Kinesiology. 2014;46(2):179-185.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

© 2017 All Rights Reserved | Annals of Applied Sport Science

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb