year 7, Issue 4 (Winter 2019)                   Ann Appl Sport Sci 2019, 7(4): 43-51 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Tri Thien H, Boonrod W. Socio-Cultural Impacts of Professional Football Clubs on Local Residents: Developing and Validation of Measurement Scale in Vietnam. Ann Appl Sport Sci 2019; 7 (4) :43-51
1- Faculty of Sports Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand ,
2- Faculty of Sports Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
Abstract:   (8641 Views)
Background. Football is the most popular sport in Vietnam, and this is not just a game or sports, it makes a role as nationalism, and football also is viral motivation to push up the development of socio-economic in Vietnam. To date, the majority of existing studies have focused upon the wider economic impacts, with few empirical studies of the social or cultural impacts upon local residents from professional football.
Objectives. The paper aims to develop and validate the scale of socio-cultural impacts to examine the perceptions of local residents from professional football clubs in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.
Methods. Before using questionnaire for conducting the scale of socio-cultural impacts to reach participants, structure and content validity of preliminary questionnaire is assessed by a panel of experts with using the test of Item-Objective Congruence. In addition, the reliability test for the draft questionnaire also conducted via the thirty university’s students. Data were collected from 1,500 local residents were based on a convenience sample from six cities and provinces of the three regions in Vietnam. After collecting the data, the entire data set was randomly split into two parts for exploratory factor analysis by IBM SPSS version 22.0 and confirmatory factor analysis by LISREL 9.30 in order to confirm the factor structure of the scale of socio-cultural impacts.
Results. Results of the exploratory factor analysis identified the four impact factors including three positive socio-cultural impacts as Community Enhancement and Consolidation, Health and Socio-cultural Opportunities, and Economics Benefits; and one negative socio-cultural impacts as Socio-cultural & Environment Concerns with a total variance of 62.76%. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that after adjusting model, the 4-factor with 37-item model provided a good fit to the data with the index of χ2/df = 0.343 with P-value > 0.05; RMSEA = 0.000; SRMR = 0.003; GFI = 1.000; and AGFI = 0.998.
Conclusion. It is concluded that the Scale of Socio-Cultural Impacts (SSCI) is a valid measuring instrument for assessing perception of local residents on socio-cultural impacts from professional football clubs at their community in Vietnam.
Full-Text [PDF 497 kb]   (1473 Downloads)    
- This finding should encourage the professional football clubs to strengthen ties with the local residents to ensure that they are develop their positive perceptions on socio-cultural impacts of the clubs as well as decrease their negative perceptions on socio-cultural impacts of the clubs.
- It is important for professional football club’s managers to deeply understand and response to enhance the perceptions of local residents and/or spectators to let the professional football club develop sustainably.
- Regarding the valid and reliable scale for measuring the socio-cultural impacts of professional football clubs to local residents, it is suggested for the football league’s managers and/or executives; football club’s managers and marketers; and local governments on department of sports to employ this instrument to assess and receive useful information from local residents for improve the developing strategies for professional football in Vietnam.

Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Sport Sociology and History
Received: 2019/06/11 | Accepted: 2019/08/5

1. Sommerville S. Vietnamese Football: An in-depth Analysis 2017 [updated 2018
2. cited 2019]. Available from:
3. Duong NC. The establishment of the professional football in Vietnam 2017 [cited 2019 2019]. Available from:ự-ra-đời-B243ng-đ225-chuy234n-nghiệp-Việt-Nam.
4. Pham NV. Situations of professional football in Vietnam: Vietnam Sports Administration: Sport Science Magazines; 2017.
5. Quoc D. Building a soccer culture from scratch: Chairman of T&T Group. Vietnam: The Leader 2018 [cited 2019 2019]. Available from:
6. Gómez-Bantel A. Football clubs as symbols of regional identities. Soccer Soc. 2015;17(5):692-702. [DOI:10.1080/14660970.2015.1100430]
7. Duerden J. Vietnam football's reaping rewards from investments in youth development 2017 [cited 2019 2018]. Available from:
8. Morgan N, Pritchard A, Pride R. Destination brands: Managing place reputation: Routledge; 2011.
9. Morgan N. Time for 'mindful' destination management and marketing. J Destinat Market Manag. 2012;1(1-2):8-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdmm.2012.07.003]
10. Sparvero E, Chalip L. Professional Teams as Leverageable Assets: Strategic Creation of Community Value. Sport Manag Rev. 2007;10(1):1-30. [DOI:10.1016/S1441-3523(07)70001-3]
11. Knott B, Swart K, Visser S. The impact of sport mega-events on the quality of life for host city residents: reflections on the 2010 FIFA World Cup. 2015 2223-814X.
12. Chalkley-Rhoden S. Decline of women's sports coverage in Australia 'a tragedy': report shows drop in coverage 2015. Available from:
13. SQW. Culture 10 evaluation final report. Leeds: SQW Consultants; 2006.
14. Babbie E. The practice of social research. New York: Macmillan; 1992.
15. Rovinelli RJ, Hambleton RK. On the use of content specialists in the assessment of criterion-referenced test item validity. Dutch J Edu Res. 1976;2(1):49-60.
16. Pongpaew T. Educational Research. Mahasarakhram: Mahasarakhram University; 2009.
17. Ary D, Jocobs LC, Razavieh A, Corensen C. Introduction to research in education. Belmont, CA: Thomson Higher Education; 2006.
18. Su CT, Parham LD. Generating a valid questionnaire translation for cross-cultural use. Am J Occup Ther. 2002;56(5):581-585. [DOI:10.5014/ajot.56.5.581] [PMID]
19. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2006.
20. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford; 2005.
21. Andriotis K, Vaughan RD. Urban Residents' Attitudes toward Tourism Development: The Case of Crete. J Travel Res. 2016;42(2):172-185. [DOI:10.1177/0047287503257488]
22. Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika. 1974;39(1):31-36. [DOI:10.1007/BF02291575]
23. Andrew DPS, Pederson PM, McEvoy CD. Research methods and design in sport management. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2011.
24. Meyers LS, Gamst G, Guarino AJ. Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2005.
25. Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Routledge; 2010.
26. Hutcheson G, Sofroniou N. The multivariate social scientist: Introductory statistics using generalized linear models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1999.
27. Bollen KA. Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1989. [DOI:10.1002/9781118619179] [PMCID]
28. Cattell RB. The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. Multivariate Behav Res. 1966;1(2):245-276. [DOI:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10] [PMID]
29. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990;107(2):238-246. [DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238] [PMID]
30. Hu Lt, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Model Multidisciplin J. 1999;6(1):1-55. [DOI:10.1080/10705519909540118]
31. Steiger JH. Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach. Multivariate Behav Res. 1990;25(2):173-180. [DOI:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4] [PMID]
32. Reisinger Y, Turner L. Structural equation modeling with Lisrel: application in tourism. Tourism Manage. 1999;20(1):71-88. [DOI:10.1016/S0261-5177(98)00104-6]
33. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psycholo Bull. 1988;103(3):411-423. [DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411]
34. Mihalik BJ, Cummings P, editors. Host perceptions of the 1996 Atlanta Olympics: Support, attendance, benefits and liabilities. Travel and tourism research association 26th annual proceedings; 1995.
35. Ritchie JRB, Aitken CE. Olympulse II - Evolving Resident Attitudes Toward the 1988 Olympic Winter Games. J Travel Res. 2016;23(3):28-33. [DOI:10.1177/004728758502300306]
36. Tomiyama A. Historic soccer run brings unequal Vietnam together. Japan: Nikkei Asian Review 2018 [cited 2019 2018]. Available from:
37. Waitt G. Social impacts of the Sydney Olympics. Annals of Tourism Research. 2003;30(1):194-215. [DOI:10.1016/S0160-7383(02)00050-6]

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Annals of Applied Sport Science

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb